Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jenny65
I don't have the exact figures, but as I recall, book authors and musical artists make less than a dollar from each copy sold. After manufacturing, marketing and distribution, it's the media companies that get the biggest share of the pot. With what little they do make from CD sales, most recording artists are forced to tour just to make money.

This would create an incentive for new groups to say "to hell with signing with a record label". Just put their stuff up on Napster, or their own web site. Put up samples for free, put up CD for sale, price the CD dirt cheap since the label and the music store aren't getting a cut, and use their recorded music as a draw for their touring performances

Soon, the record labels would go bust. This is what really worries them about file-sharing

134 posted on 08/27/2002 11:19:08 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: SauronOfMordor
Moral or immoral, legal or illegal, the file sharing application are here to stay. They Big 5 record companies are going to have to come up with a way to use this technology to their advantage or their sales will continue to decline (this and many other reasons are contributing to the decline of music sales).

They tried to defeat it with the latest Celine Deion CD and their vaunted "copy-protection software". That was fine until someone with a $0.99 Sharpie defeated it. Reports are, the next generation copy-protection system has already been hacked. Supply and demand will rule the day...as it always does.

135 posted on 08/27/2002 11:28:27 AM PDT by Wyatt's Torch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

To: SauronOfMordor
They are tools. The Movie Industry thought that VHS would ruin movie sales because people wouldn't see movies, wouldn't buy them on tape. They would just copy them. They are making record grosses in the theaters the last several years instead. They are selling their old catalog on DVD for incredibly low prices. Warner Brothers has set a selling point of $9.99 for most movies that are at least 5 years old that are being re-released on DVD.

Did anybody here know that it actually is more expensive to produce a cassette tape than a CD? It is true. The consumers are being gouged, and intuitively know it. The record industry did promise that the high prices of CDs would drop once the investment in CD technology was payed for in a few years. That promise was as faithful as Bill Clinton's wedding vows.

The artists are actually losing money sometimes when they sell 1 million, because of the egregious contracts they sign with the record companies. If they didn't make money on tour, some well known artists would literally be bankrupt.

The whole industry is a waste. Radio used to be what drove the industry. Except now, Clear Channel, and Infinity own about all the market, and they only put on drivel, that is given to them, that they play because of payola.

You can not force people over 25 to buy N'sync albums. It just won't happen. Talented artists before actually could get a record playing at one station, in one market, at one independent station, and it could spread like wildfire. Those days are over in radio. MP3 sharing is the only way a non bubblegum corporate act is going to get heard these days.

But RIAA says it is all Napster's fault. I am incredibly ticked off at this AP writer for putting out their position with no counterpoint. You are in a recession, and the music stinks, but it is all college kids on computer's fault that sales are down 7%. This is a pathetic piece of journalism.

139 posted on 08/27/2002 11:37:10 AM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson