>Ever heard of the vikings?
Are you serious, or just trying to be silly?
>They are nordic, not celtic. Teutonic and gallic are not the same,
even though in modern day england, the two are mixed and indestinguishable.
The Nordics and Gauls are not exactly the same, just as Dutch and Flemish are not exactly the same. But ALL are Celtic. Members of the 12 Tribes of Israel were not exactly the same, but they were all Israelites.
Please read the 3-MINUTE HISTORY by clicking on my LostTribe Profile below for the details, and to read a short list of the many Celtic tribes which make up todays Europe and America.
Thanks for the lesson. I've never before heard that the nordics are related to the gauls. And to be frank(pun intended), I don't yet beleive you. I will be looking into this. I knew that the celts of the british isles were somehow descended(sp?) of the gauls. And I have heard the theory that the first european celts somehow came from semites that were in the anatolian peninsula and were thought to be one of the lost tribes. THis much I have accepted as probable.
Now, I have one more race for you to explain. The slavs. They are neither gallic nor teutonic and as far as I know, they are not related to neither the celts nor the nordics. I suppose you are going to tell me these too are semites and are the same as celts and nordics?