[St.Chuck]

And many here still maintain there is nothing wrong with US foreign policy?

You can bet that if Zimbabwe had a vast oil supply, Bush, et.al. would be beating the war drums for action against Mugabe and his terrorists.

[Henchster]

"You can bet that if Zimbabwe had a vast oil supply, Bush, et.al. would be beating the war drums for action against Mugabe and his terrorists."

Correction: "You can bet that if Zimbabwe had a vast oil Chemical/biological weapons supply, and had been proven to be funding/supporting terrorists acts against Americans, Bush, et.al. would be beating the war drums for action against Mugabe and his terrorists."

[Carry_Okie]

They do have a vast platinum supply.

[Go Gordon]

You can bet that if Zimbabwe had a vast oil supply, Bush, et.al. would be beating the war drums for action against Mugabe and his terrorists.

Whats your point? That since oil isn't involved, then its not a US national security issue? And, therefore, we have no interest in how another country treats its people, and its really none of our business?

[Khurkris]

"You can bet that if Zimbabwe had a vast oil supply, Bush, et.al. would be beating the war drums for action against Mugabe and his terrorists."

You might well be right there Chuckie...it falls to logic that people elect a President who has the BEST INTERESTS of their nation on his/her agenda.

But I notice a strange silence from the 'back to Africa' group. Nothing from Calypso Louie, Fast Al Sharpton and the 'Right Reverend J.Jackson...hmmm...I guess sharks know when there is nothing but bones.