Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Always Right
This is NOT the best info available. The figures you quoted are the imaginary ones that MLB pulled out of its collective ass earlier this year.

Try here: http://www.forbes.com/home/2002/04/01/0401baseball.html

You'll note, of course, that the teams losing money in fact, are the teams subject to terrible mismanagement.

Andrew
45 posted on 08/24/2002 11:25:21 AM PDT by Andy Ross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Andy Ross
Here's an excerp from your article:

"Why the difference between our figures and the MLB's? For starters, MLB includes "non-cash" charges in its cash flow numbers. Specifically, the league subtracts ballpark depreciation expenses. For teams that finance their own stadiums, like the San Francisco Giants and Detroit Tigers, ballpark depreciation runs over $5 million per team annually.

I subtract building depreciation in my business too. Are they somehow implying that baseball statiums appreciate in value instead of depreciate. Seems like the Forbes numbers are not up to standard business practices, IMHO. And even if the Forbes numbers are correct, a $75 million profit for Baseball is an absolute joke. These teams are valued at roughly $10 billion, so a $75 million profit represents a whopping 0.75% return! Shoot, the top couple of players earn more than the 30 owners combined and they don't have one penny invested. So yes, the players are WAY overpaid in a real business sense. They simply are not worth what they are paid. Not even close.

46 posted on 08/24/2002 11:43:00 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson