And the GOP offers similar panderers, so what is the point you're making? They're all pandering to people who can only vote illegally.
President George W. Bush, isn't perfect-I am sure he would be the first to admit that-but when he is stood up beside the above listed dimocrats and other choices within our own party, his flaws by comparison seem non-existant.
Next to most of the democrats, Lucifer looks like a good choice. That doesn't make Bush's standing with the democrats on immigration and amnesty any more palatable. He's simply working on merging the two parties the way he did as governor of Texas. That's what that ridiculous "uniter not a divider" garbage was all about. You want to merge with the democrats, go ahead. I'll keep opposing them. Opposing Bush is a logical move if opposing the democrats is the goal.
Bush is the right man for the job in these trying times, I support his actions, trust his judgement and Pray God's blessings and annointing upon him.
That doesn't square with your opposition to illegal aliens at all. Bush wants to facilitate the invasion. He's definitely not the right man for anything other than dismantling this country. I trust him as far as I could sling him with my left arm.
Lucifer is available every election,running under many names but is exposed by his/her always pro-abortion stance, I argue that he would have trouble looking like a good choice up beside even the likes Stalin, Mao,Sadam Hussian, Usama Bin Laden, Castro or even Bill or Hillary Clinton-or in any of the many famous human bodies that have played host to this paracite.
I agree but there is one group that Bush has totally divided out of the equation...Conservatives. I use to wince when Bush referred to his campaign as "Compassionate Conservatism" as if being conservative was some evil mean spirited thing.