No, I think I got you pretty well pegged. You assert yourself on immigration threads "as if" you are in a position of authority, which when examining your often conflicting arguments is laughable.
Your Modus Operandi time and again is to advocate the removal of the most important parts of an immigration reform bill while suggesting “token”, half-measures that have little impact. Or, likewise, take an Amnesty bill like 245(i) and broaden the bill to include many more illegal aliens while dreaming up meaningless restrictions that have no real effect on controlling illegal immigration. In fact the upshot of your disingenuous immigration proposals is to actually encourage MORE illegal immigration—NOT LESS.
The funny part is how you like to cast yourself as merely acting responsibly and "imply" that only YOU know what is politically feasible and what is not. It's a silly transparent charade you play and one that is not lost on most in this forum.
In reality, you are an exponent of the Beltway's "anything goes" open borders immigration "free for all" agenda and you try mightily to cover that up with cynical proposals that are really meant to destroy any meaningful immigration reform legislation.
In short...You Aren't Fooling Anybody.
Tell me, if someone you knew (friend or relative) had two years of 24/7 experience with a group of people, would you or would you not ask him for information about the people in question?
Sorry, I make up my own opinions in an independent fashion from numerous sources and don't need an "appeal to authority" to be told what to think.