Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sabertooth
I explained in post 244, but I'll repeat it here.

I'd double the number of additional Border Patrol agents (16,000 as opposed to 8,000) and the INS agents (4,000 as opposed to 2,000) in the Gekas bill.

Is that a suitable start?
494 posted on 08/23/2002 10:21:50 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies ]


To: hchutch
I'd double the number of additional Border Patrol agents (16,000 as opposed to 8,000) and the INS agents (4,000 as opposed to 2,000) in the Gekas bill. Is that a suitable start?

Anything's a suitable start. What I don't understand is why you want such a huge Amnesty for millions before you begin augmenting our security at the border.

Amnesty rewards illegal behavior. Past experience and common sense show that Amnesty attracts more Illegals. Your problem at the border will get worse, not better, if you grant an Amnesty.




500 posted on 08/23/2002 10:39:47 AM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 494 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson