Him and CJ always gloat when the state takes kids from their parents, and here they obviously see nothing wrong with shooting a father over child support either...
I believe they were trying to arrest him over the child support. They shot him over holding a family hostage and attempting to shoot the police. Slight difference.
Drew Garrett
Never mind the fact that I did not address the issues of this particular case. I see that the so called "father" did shoot at the officers and held a family hostage. You choose to ignore that.
And as usual you throw your support behind the person committing the criminal acts because it fits your agenda. You and Roger seem to have a slipping grasp on reality. Does he believe in alien crop circles, too?
RGS tirelessly shot down every factual inaccuracy purported by ideologues who hate CPS and would use any vehicle they could get their hands on to shout their message. They chose poorly in the Christine case and had their innuendo, lies and misleaidng info shredded as only FR can do. The Christines did abuse their kids, got their day in court and lost both cases. The only joy he took was proving what liars many of the defenders were and that the Christine children were safe with their grandparents.
Now if you are in the camp that feels that it is preferable for children to be property of the parents as opposed to the state and that we must suffer child abuse as the price for having the liberty of raising children as a parent sees fit, I can sympathize but not agree with you.
But then again with this guy who shoots at cops and takes families hostage, I think you guys have another "champion" for the cause.