[Home By Dark]

=>I answered your first question in a straightforward manner and asked you questions which you ignored. Now I'll answer your second question in a straightforward manner and hope you'll give the dialogue your best effort.

The constitution does not detail how the children of divorced people will be raised. If you think that means that the constitution provides an open invitation for government to dictate and enforce arbitrary orders, you don't understand the constitution.


I assume from your failure to answer the question, and repeated whiney posts about the woes and sorrows of divorced dads that you have NO idea how the children of divorced people should be raised.

It's one thing to be aware of a problem. It's quite another to go on whining about it interminably with no idea how things could be fairly and equitably done.

[RogerFGay]

BWAAAHAAAHAAHA

[Don Joe]

"I assume from your failure to answer the question, and repeated whiney posts about the woes and sorrows of divorced dads that you have NO idea how the children of divorced people should be raised."

He answered your question in the only way it was possible to answer it in a rational manner.

Your question was tantamount to, "Where in the Constitution does it say that husbands can't beat their wives?"