"Uh, no. If you read the constitution, you will note that it has nothing to do with state/local courts, which deal with divorce/child support issues. To keep droning on about the constitution when it does not apply is irrational."
Spin, spin, spin.
The issues was the Constitutionality or lack thereof of what is done to fathers. I eviscerated the attempt to reframe that issue, and now you cry foul?
Put some ice on it.