Thanks for the advance generalization.
Actually I would like to hear your story of woe since the amount of venom you put out about this issue should make it a doozy.
You have tried to justify the actions of a guy who held hostages by his treatment at the hands of child support collectors. Mr. K would be a much better case to promote though I doubt he wants the job. I am sure there are many like him otherwise why have a fathers movement in the first place.
It's the extolling of the extreme via armed conflict that seems to be a theme in these CPS battles. Not many want to defend CPS but fewer want to defend child abusers and armed hostage takers. I hate to say it but some of you guys sound like suicide by cop candidates. And that is frightening.
Be my guest, but extend the courtesy of reading all my traffic in that post before assuming you've seen the whole picture.
"You have tried to justify the actions of a guy who held hostages by his treatment at the hands of child support collectors."
Bovina fecundis. I explained it. There is a wide gulf between explaining something and defending it.
By your brand of "logic", the Weisenthal Center is "defending the actions of the nazis."
"I hate to say it but some of you guys sound like suicide by cop candidates. And that is frightening."
You sound like you need thorazine.
As an enthusiastic non-supporter of the current laws regarding child support, this is what worries me. If these guys want to get themselves blown away by the police, fine, that just makes them Darwin Award candidates. What concerns me is that the good name of FR will be besmirched by their membership in the forum.