[ProudAmerican2]

It does no such thing ["suggest that you knew that the evidence exists"].

I know that the evidence MUST exist if Bush goes before Congress to ask financing for further actions, he's required to have a reason why it is needed. But's that's a far cry from my saying that I have knowledge of that proof.

Can anyone spot the inconsistency here?

[Luis Gonzalez]

Nope, no inconsistency, other than in a desperate mind trying to dig itself out of a hole.

I claim no knowledge of any information that the president and his cabinet may, or may nor have. I do recognize that in order to go before Congress to ask for further financing of this conflict, the president must make his case to them.

As such, I know that when the time comes, the evidence will be brought forth.

Don't try to hang on to floating straws when you're drowning.

P.S. You supported the action against Afghanistan? Based on what?