Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
Hostettler IS grossly insensitive, to bring abortion up to a group of women who overcame breast cancer but did not have abortions.

Why?! If the abortions are the major cause (about 50%) of breast cancer, why to make a taboo out of it? If those women want the money for the research, why would they want to supress the results of it? If the physicians were so "sensitive" they would never be able to use scalpel or any pain causing procedure. Sometimes a little of painful truth is beneficial.

I am surprised that you Sinkspur desire so much sensitivity.

12 posted on 08/21/2002 7:50:49 PM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: A. Pole
I am surprised that you Sinkspur desire so much sensitivity.

OK. Then how about some manners?

Hostettler, speaking to his constituents, managed to piss off most of them.

What did he accomplish? What did his "abortion leads to breast cancer" idealism do to advance the pro-life cause?

Little, if you ask me.

18 posted on 08/21/2002 8:03:09 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson