Skip to comments.
Deploying Marines for gays, feminism and peacekeeping (ANN COULTER)Slams the left
worldnetdaily ^
| 8/21/2002
| Ann Coulter
Posted on 08/21/2002 4:27:27 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
1
posted on
08/21/2002 4:27:28 PM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
To: TLBSHOW
Posted by lancer256 On Aug 21 6:11 PM with 4 comments
Lancer256 beat you by about 15 min. The boy has a eye for Ann's mind.
To: TLBSHOW
I'm glad she brought up the Kosovo mess and compared it to Iraq. LOL. Good grief. We bombed a bridge during rush hour, deliberately, during Kosovo, for 'ideal impact'. We bombed a Serb TV station because we didn't like what it was saying. Civilian Christian Serbs slaughtered daily in that war for the sake of displaced Albanians trying to move to Kosovo.
To: TLBSHOW
*****Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said our purpose in the Balkans was "ending ethnic strife" and creating "multiethnic societies."******
...in addition to that is also helped "move the dialogue forward...(sarcasm)
To: Arthur Wildfire! March
We bombed a bridge during rush hour, deliberately, during Kosovo, for 'ideal impact'. We bombed a Serb TV station because we didn't like what it was saying. Civilian Christian Serbs slaughtered daily in that war for the sake of displaced Albanians trying to move to Kosovo.Also a commuter train and an OB/GYN ward.
5
posted on
08/21/2002 4:56:51 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
And all from 50,000 feet?
To: Arthur Wildfire! March
The war against Serbia was one war I could not support (my youthful opposition to the Vietnam war notwithstanding and I changed my views there).
Don Feder made the excellent case against support the Islamic drug runners in Kosovo.
Ann Coulter does give the misleading impression that Henry Kissenger opposes a war with Iraq. This is not the case. I made the same mistake earlier about Dr. Kissenger and made my amends.
7
posted on
08/21/2002 5:01:37 PM PDT
by
UbIwerks
To: BenLurkin
And the Chinese embassy?
8
posted on
08/21/2002 5:02:39 PM PDT
by
abclily
To: BenLurkin
And the Chinese embassy?
9
posted on
08/21/2002 5:02:59 PM PDT
by
abclily
To: TLBSHOW
i have been gone for a couple of weeks has the rule about ann coulter changed since there are no pics
To: TLBSHOW
i have been gone for a couple of weeks has the rule about ann coulter changed since there are no pics
To: summer; Howlin; mombonn; Sabertooth; Miss Marple; *Ann Coulter list; BraveMan; 1riot1ranger; ...
Pinging the Coulter list.
12
posted on
08/21/2002 5:40:47 PM PDT
by
Pokey78
To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
Hey! Where the pictures?
To: UbIwerks
Don Feder made the excellent case against support the Islamic drug runners in Kosovo.Indeed. The KLAs primary revenue to finance their war was/is drugs. Principled Muslims, aren't they?
To: TLBSHOW
If the possible nuking of the US is a trigger
to invade Iraq (Iraq has ICBMs? I really
don't think so.), then shouldn't we be
going into Communist China first? They
have already professed a willingness to
render Los Angeles livable again, if
slightly radioactive, and China has the
means to deliver. No, Anne, Saddam's
phantom ability to nuke Manhattan isn't
a threat to the United States, any more
than Slobo's ethnic cleaning was.
We don't yet have any justification
for invading Iraq. If you're talking
national interest, then the logical
people to take out Saddam are
the Israelis.
15
posted on
08/21/2002 6:02:04 PM PDT
by
gcruse
To: TLBSHOW
The point which is always the same point is that we must not protect ourselves but should just let liberals run the world.
Bingo. Liberalism is a ploy by a few would be tyrants to gain the support of the masses by convincing them to work for some purpose, any purpose, that is not to one's own damn good, not subject to common sense.
If you're working for the obvious benefit of yourself, your family and your neighbors, doing something you can observe the benefits and costs of, and experience the results of, then you are the enemy of liberals. For you are in control of your own life.
If you can be persuaded, out of guilt or fear or whatever, to work to save the starving children in a faraway land (not the one next door), or the environment (but not the tree in your backyard) or the victims of genocide or the homeless or the elderly (in the abstract - not your actual mother) or world peace or whatever, then you are in the control of the spinmeisters who establish these "goals". They can get you to do anything, just by spinning it right.
For a few, such as Dr. Livingston or Mother Theresa, such faraway ills are immediate and personal, and something to be directly addressed from personal awareness. God bless them.
But do-gooders from a distance are a dangerous fuel for the liberal mischief of tyrants.
To: Frohickey
To: ThePythonicCow
To: ThePythonicCow
To: ThePythonicCow
If you can be persuaded, out of guilt or fear or whatever, to work to save the starving children in a faraway land (not the one next door), or the environment (but not the tree in your backyard) or the victims of genocide or the homeless or the elderly (in the abstract - not your actual mother) or world peace or whatever, then you are in the control of the spinmeisters who establish these "goals". They can get you to do anything, just by spinning it right. Ooh, I like this statement. Thanks.
20
posted on
08/21/2002 6:22:32 PM PDT
by
serinde
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson