Then he has no more capacity to strike the US with nukes than North Korea or China or any other nuclear power, including the former republics of the USSR. Yeah, so whats your point? That we have to deal with China and North Korea before we deal with Iraq? So basically you don't have a problem with a regime change in Iraq, you would just prefer them to be number three on the hit parade. Is that your point gcruse?
If we're going to go pre-emptive, China is the greater threat. Unless Saddam can be tied to 9/11, we shouldn't be attacking Iraq at all.