[BenLurkin]

Absolutely fight wars for American interests and Amercian interests only!
Bush has yet to make a coherent case for invading Iraq however; let's hope he does so soon.

[Russell Scott]

Excellent!

In other words what Ann is trying to say is "turn all logic and reason inside out so I (liberals) can run everything. It reminds me of when Lucifer said he was now God, even though he was created as an angel. He wasn't created a God, he was created an angel. And yet he got 1/3 of the angels to believe he was now God. It must have been a "warm, fuzzy feeling" Lucifer gave them, since if he was God, he wouldn't have been created, he just would have always existed. Now you know why there is no logic or reason behind liberalism, because it derives all its power from lies and deception. They are just following the liberal model satan layed out eons ago.

[Plutarch]

...we must first receive approval from the Europeans, especially the Germans. (Good thing we didn't have that rule in 1941!)

Well actually, we did receive German approval of sorts. Germany declared war on the U.S. before we declared it on them.

[IronJack]

I guess my question would be "To whom do we need to justify ANY military action we undertake?" I don't care how lopsided, unilateral, inequitable, ill-advised, self-serving, short-sighted or whatever else the Left wants to label it. Our interests are OURS, not Englands, not Germany's, not Saudi Arabia's. And since there's adequate evidence (absent a glowing radioactive hole in Manhattan Island) that Saddam Hussein is a past patron of terrorists, and a proud sponsor of the current batch, how is military action against him unjustified?

These jerks would send Tojo a bouquet of chrysanthemums on December 8, 1941, with an apology for shooting down a couple of their airplanes.