To: nickcarraway
I wouldn't be surprised. Having some religious wacko screaming "Murderer! Murderer!" in your face is bound to unsettle anyone.
Live births remain 8 times more deadly than abortions, however. And even live births result in post-partum depression, etc.
So women face the choice of a 63% greater risk of depression if they abort versus an 800% greater risk of dying in child birth if they go to term.
Life is full of choices. Be pro-choice.
16 posted on
08/21/2002 1:22:47 PM PDT by
jlogajan
To: jlogajan
How about being pro-
informed-choice? The Democrats fought GW on pre-natal funding for poor women because it offered them the option of a sonogram prior to making a choice (guess seeing fingers and toes moving altered their thinking)...guess Planned Parenthood was worried about its bottom line...
no dead fetuses:no money::no money:no power.
To: jlogajan
To: jlogajan
It's a CHILD not a choice...
To: jlogajan
"Live births remain 8 times more deadly than abortions, however."
Your source for this number?
24 posted on
08/21/2002 1:40:08 PM PDT by
babygene
To: jlogajan
Live births remain 8 times more deadly than abortions, howeverThat's simply not true. Especially in this country, where abortion is much less safe than say, Canada. In California, they are trying to pass a bill that will allow abortions to be performed by nondoctors.
To: jlogajan
Live births remain 8 times more deadly than abortions, howeverAbortions are 100% deadly to little babies. Well, except for the ones that survive and then are left to die in a pan. Or are born without part of their brain or missing an arm. But I guess that doesn't bother you any. As long as "people are allowed to make choices".
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson