Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barr loses Georgia Primary. Libertarian Party claims partial responsibility.
Libertarian Party ^ | 08/21/2002 | George Getz, Press Secretary

Posted on 08/21/2002 11:48:18 AM PDT by EBUCK

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-173 next last
The LP has an effect, take that WODers.

Link to view ads...C.A. Rand's page

EBUCK

1 posted on 08/21/2002 11:48:18 AM PDT by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
I would be curious to be able to examine a precint by precinct breakdown to see if Democrats crossing over did not have an equal or greater efect....
2 posted on 08/21/2002 11:50:36 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
Of course they do. They helped elect Max Cleland in 1996. Thanks, dope smokers.
3 posted on 08/21/2002 11:50:54 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
Barr loses 67% to 33% and you think a series of ads on medical marijuana swung the vote? Don't you think that's a little like losing a football game by 30 points and complaining it was the officiating?
4 posted on 08/21/2002 11:52:36 AM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
"For one thing, our ad was virtually the only issue-based TV spot in the campaign, so it became a lightning rod for publicity. Both Barr and Linder ran personality- based, feel-good ads. Linder's main ad simply described how he met his wife, which was designed to leave voters with a warm, fuzzy feeling. And Barr's TV spot came to be called the 'Barr is gooder' ad. It portrayed a good 'ol boy saying, 'Linder is good. But I'm going to vote for Barr, because he's gooder.'
Can someone post a link / describe this ad?
5 posted on 08/21/2002 11:52:48 AM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
The LPers are smoking too much if they think they are responsible for Barr's 2 to 1 loss.
6 posted on 08/21/2002 11:53:36 AM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
The LP is full of used food. Barr would have lost even if the LP hadn't come up with a candidate...

The loss was Barr's own damn fault.

7 posted on 08/21/2002 11:53:41 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative; hobbes1
The way I understand it, the whole purpose of the LP running the campaign was to get Barr Bumped. That done the LP will now leave the race to Linder to win or lose without LP opposition.

EBUCK

8 posted on 08/21/2002 11:54:21 AM PDT by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad
Did you read the article? It says "appears to have played a small role in making it happen."

No one is claiming full responsibility. But I'm sure that the LP ads helped.

EBUCK

9 posted on 08/21/2002 11:56:02 AM PDT by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
Sorry, LP, but it was the Dimocrat legislature of Georgia that defeated Barr, by re-districting Barr & Linder into the same district.

Only good news coming out of Georgia is the defeat of "Sister from Another Planet," Cynthia McKinney.

10 posted on 08/21/2002 11:57:27 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
I also heard that they swung the McKinney election by running ads that said she was opposed to pornography.
11 posted on 08/21/2002 11:57:48 AM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad
Barr loses 67% to 33% and you think a series of ads on medical marijuana swung the vote?

Heck yes - 67% + 33% + the Libertarian Difference = 100%!

12 posted on 08/21/2002 11:57:54 AM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
Of couse the effect of the libertarians will be discounted. While probably not the sole reason I'm sure it had a larger effect than many wish to admit.

Polls show 73% support for medical cannabis, the neocons are going to ride this issue all the way to their graves if they don't wise up. A shame they'll take the republican party with them.
13 posted on 08/21/2002 11:59:02 AM PDT by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1; EBUCK
Doubtful. When Barr's district was redrawn, 70% of his old constitutents were in one district, and only 17% in the district that he chose to run in. His opponent, Linder, was also an incumbent who "got redrawn", and he had about 40% of his old constituents in that district. Simply by voting for "their guy", the Republicans in the newly-drawn 7th were heavily skewed towards Linder... hence Barr's defeat.

The Dems didn't need to "cross-over"... as if the same idiots who can't figure out a butterfly ballot could be accused of such a grand conspiracy as we pulled off against Cynthia McKinney. 5,000 GOP votes and 113,000 Dem votes in her district. While the 4th District IS heavily Democrat, it certainly isn't 96%!!! Now THAT'S cross-over power!

The fun part will be seeing the morons on the Left crying about the "cheating" when Georgia has OPEN Primaries, and "crossing-over" is 100% legal.

14 posted on 08/21/2002 12:00:24 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: steve50; Free the USA; headsonpikes; freeeee; *libertarians; **Georgia
Even if the LP factor was small it is a good sign that the WOD is losing ground. Besides, that Linder guy seems like a pretty good canservative.
15 posted on 08/21/2002 12:01:13 PM PDT by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Barr would have lost even if the LP hadn't come up with a candidate...

The loss was Barr's own damn fault.

I think you're right on track. I live in the 7th district. What kind of left a bad taste in my mouth about Barr is this: He could have stayed where he was and won that district. It might have been a tougher fight. But instead, he moved into what he felt would be an even "safer" district. Now thanks to that decision, we're going to lose one seat to the Dems.

16 posted on 08/21/2002 12:02:40 PM PDT by Ulysses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
thanx for the Stats....makes it pretty clear...
17 posted on 08/21/2002 12:06:08 PM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
Other targets for defeat include U.S. Rep. Henry Bonilla, R-TX; Sen. Max Cleland, D-GA; Senator Tim Hutchison, R- AR; and Senator Max Baucus, D-MT.

This is worrisome. Hopefully the ads do not have an effect on the race. This race is going to be close. Even if you do not like the WOD, we probably all prefer a Hastert run House than Gepthart run house.

18 posted on 08/21/2002 12:09:29 PM PDT by jf55510
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve50
I imagine that the rank and file libertarian is just sick about all the money being thrown away.
19 posted on 08/21/2002 12:12:06 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jf55510
I'm pretty sure that the LP blew it's wad getting rid of Barr. I really doubt that the LP has the means to take on another one this cycle.

EBUCK

20 posted on 08/21/2002 12:12:57 PM PDT by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-173 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson