Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DOJ to prosecute file swappers
ZDNet News ^ | August 20, 2002 | Declan McCullagh

Posted on 08/21/2002 10:34:16 AM PDT by Leroy S. Mort

ASPEN, Colo.--The U.S. Department of Justice is prepared to begin prosecuting peer-to-peer pirates, a top government official said on Tuesday.

John Malcolm, a deputy assistant attorney general, said Americans should realize that swapping illicit copies of music and movies is a criminal offense that can result in lengthy prison terms.

"A lot of people think these activities are legal, and they think they ought to be legal," Malcolm told an audience at the Progress and Freedom Foundation’s annual technology and politics summit.

Malcolm said the Internet has become "the world's largest copy machine" and that criminal prosecutions of copyright offenders are now necessary to preserve the viability of America's content industries. "There does have to be some kind of a public message that stealing is stealing is stealing," said Malcolm, who oversees the arm of the Justice Department that prosecutes copyright and computer crime cases.

In an interview, Malcolm would not say when prosecutions would begin. The response to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks temporarily diverted the department's resources and prevented its attorneys from focusing on this earlier, he said.

A few weeks ago, some of the most senior members of Congress pressured the Justice Department to invoke a little-known law, the No Electronic Theft (NET) Act, against peer-to-peer users who swap files without permission.

Under the NET Act, signed by President Clinton in 1997, it is a federal crime to share copies of copyrighted products such as software, movies or music with anyone, even friends or family members, if the value of the work exceeds $1,000. Violations are punishable by one year in prison, or if the value tops $2,500, "not more than five years" in prison.

Cary Sherman, president of the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), said his industry would "welcome" prosecutions that send a message to song-swappers.

"Some prosecutions that make that clear could be very helpful...I think they would think twice if they thought there was a risk of criminal prosecution," said Sherman, who was on the same conference panel.

Christopher Cookson, executive vice president of Warner Bros. and another panelist, said there was "a need for governments to step in and maintain order in society."

Swapping files in violation of the law has always been a civil offense, and the RIAA and the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) have the option of suing individual infringers and seeking damages.

But, Malcolm said, criminal prosecutions can be much more effective in intimidating file-swappers who have little assets at risk in a civil suit. "Civil remedies are not adequate...Law enforcement in that regard does have several advantages," Malcolm said. "We have the advantage, when appropriate, of opening up and conducting multi-jurisdictional and international investigations.

"Most parents would be horrified if they walked into a child's room and found 100 stolen CDs...However, these same parents think nothing of having their children spend time online downloading hundreds of songs without paying a dime."

Gary Shapiro, president of the Consumer Electronics Association, said he was skeptical about the view that peer-to-peer piracy should be a criminal offense. "If we have 70 million people in the United States who are breaking the law, we have a big issue."

The DOJ already has used the NET Act to imprison noncommercial software pirates, which software lobbyists hailed as "an important component of the overall effort to prevent software theft."

During his confirmation hearing in June 2001, Attorney General John Ashcroft told Congress that "given the fact that much of America's strength in the world economy is a result of our being the developer and promoter of most of the valuable software, we cannot allow the assets that are held electronically to be pirated or infringed. And so we will make a priority of cybercrime issues."

The letter from Congress complains of "a staggering increase in the amount of intellectual property pirated over the Internet through peer-to-peer systems." Signed by 19 members of Congress, including Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del., Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., and Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Ca., the letter urged Ashcroft "to prosecute individuals who intentionally allow mass copying from their computer over peer-to-peer networks."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Technical
KEYWORDS: justiceriaamp3
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 481-490 next last
"Lengthy prison terms" eh? I got a feeling we may need a whole lot more jails real soon.
1 posted on 08/21/2002 10:34:16 AM PDT by Leroy S. Mort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
check out Freenet, the secure, anonymous, strongly-encrypted internet. It's free, it's peer-to-peer, and it works
2 posted on 08/21/2002 10:38:13 AM PDT by WindMinstrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
Biden and Feinstein are FOR this? That gives me just one more reason to be against it.
3 posted on 08/21/2002 10:38:51 AM PDT by Dead Corpse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
Boycott Hollyweird until it quits trying to intimidate Real America!
4 posted on 08/21/2002 10:41:03 AM PDT by glc1173@aol.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
I'll believe it when I see it...

I have a feeling this is just some propaganda shoveled out by the Justice Department to appease the recording industry.

Oh they may shut down a couple people running servers with 20,000 songs on them as an example. There is no way they would risk the political fallout of mass arrests of teenagers and college age kids. Remember we live in the society were the "children" can do no wrong.

5 posted on 08/21/2002 10:45:11 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
I agree. Next, we must lobby the gubmint to crack down on public libraries which lend out books without paying royalties to the publishers; after that we can start raiding the illegal singing of Happy Birthday at birthday parties, and we can proceed to the kindergarten poem recitations.
6 posted on 08/21/2002 10:45:36 AM PDT by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
Hey, our DOJ can't jail the traitors at Loral, nor the Lynx enviro-criminals, nor look into the IRS audits against Republicans, nor the collectiing of FBI files by the previous administration, nor look into the current Saudi funding of terrorists, yet they can snap to attention for Hollywood, and crucify a reporter for being GIVEN, by a government insider, a small swath of frabric from a downed plane in order to test it.

Hey Aschcroft! Better get back to important things like covering up the boobs on the rest of those statues around D.C.

7 posted on 08/21/2002 10:45:48 AM PDT by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
ASPEN, Colo.--The U.S. Department of Justice is prepared to begin prosecuting peer-to-peer pirates, a top government official said on Tuesday.

They'd better be prepared for a gunfight on several occasions. It will come to that.

8 posted on 08/21/2002 10:47:02 AM PDT by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
My kids won't be happy to hear this.
9 posted on 08/21/2002 10:48:25 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
The DOJ will probably pattern the new War on Music like the grossly incompetent War of Drugs.

God help us.

10 posted on 08/21/2002 10:49:31 AM PDT by wcbtinman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: WindMinstrel
check out FREENET

The problem isn't interception while you are exchanging files; it is the no-knock search to check your computer for too many games and MP3s.

12 posted on 08/21/2002 10:51:52 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
More proof that our government has degenerated into nothing more than the enforcement arm of the media (Hollywood, RIAA, MPAA, etc.).
13 posted on 08/21/2002 10:53:23 AM PDT by Vast Buffalo Wing Conspiracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WindMinstrel
check out Freenet, the secure, anonymous, strongly-encrypted internet. It's free, it's peer-to-peer, and it works
Damn traitors. No Real American should have any problem with Our Government keeping an eye on everything we do. It's only to protect us, after all. [/Sarcasm]

-Eric

14 posted on 08/21/2002 10:55:13 AM PDT by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vast Buffalo Wing Conspiracy
Tell the man, and his boss, what you think: http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/contacts.html

I did.

15 posted on 08/21/2002 11:11:48 AM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: WindMinstrel
Two things:

1) My tax money is spent to help the RIAA fight file swapping. Ergo, I am paying these record companies for rendering no service to me, indirectly, through taxes. I have no problem downloading songs now, because I paid them for something

2) In the 19th century, there was a burgeoning industry involved with shipping ice from the arctic to tropical regions, to preserve food. Refridgeration killed that whole industry. The ice shippers were not interested in marketing refridgeration, or evolving with it. They tried to quash it.

The same thing is happening here. The world has moved on. The record companies want to PASS LAWS so that they don't have to move on with the world.

All they need to do is cut the prices of CDs and allow file sharing. People would flock to have 'hard copy' or 'official copies' of songs they downloaded from the internet. But at $16-$20 a pop, who would bother?

But they don't want to change. They want to hold the world in statis to match their already successful business plan.

/rant
16 posted on 08/21/2002 11:13:13 AM PDT by Goodlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
I have no problem with this. As long as that is the primary focus of the DOJ. I mean, why pursue Ken Lay, hell, he only stole billions. Let's go after the kids, they can't afford mega lawyers.
17 posted on 08/21/2002 11:56:51 AM PDT by Nuke'm Glowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
I have no problem with this. As long as that is the primary focus of the DOJ. I mean, why pursue Ken Lay, hell, he only stole billions. Let's go after the kids, they can't afford mega lawyers.
18 posted on 08/21/2002 11:57:15 AM PDT by Nuke'm Glowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Goodlife
their Actual biggest Fear is that more established artists, will imtitate Jimmy Buffet, and eschew the record companies altogether. BY upping THEIR share of the profits less copies need to be sold....forcing a rapid decentralization of who controls production.IT also opens the door for more acts to be heard on a wider basis...
19 posted on 08/21/2002 12:12:21 PM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc
I thought it was to protect the Children....LOL
20 posted on 08/21/2002 12:13:19 PM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 481-490 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson