To: Amore
I think he was guilty as well.
Reading the transcripts, it is cleat that Feldman was trying but had little to work with. On his crosses, many of his questions were objected to and sustained by the Court. This, alone, demonstrates to the jury that the defense is strugling.
To: ContemptofCourt
Thanks for weighing in on the attorneys-who-believe-DW-is-guilty side!
Yep, Feldy had little to work with, and did the best he could. But of course they'll be the inevitable claims that Feldy provided ineffective assistance down the collateral road. (Ha! Most defendants should be so lucky as to get such good representation).
But the fact that Judge Mudd wasn't another Judge Ito and wouldn't let Feldy get away with a bunch of baloney is only further evidence to the other side that he is part of that evil conspiracy by all the SD authorities against DW.
882 posted on
08/22/2002 7:11:12 AM PDT by
Amore
To: ContemptofCourt
"On his crosses, many of his questions were objected to and sustained by the Court. This, alone, demonstrates to the jury that the defense is strugling."
Or, that the defense is being railroaded.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson