Replies

...some of the Westerfield supporters were so vitriolic it just didn't seem normal.

Think about it: They were defending a monster in human flesh. They flippantly dismissed the torture and rape of children on the hours and HOURS of child pornography as trivial.

These are NOT normal people. Of COURSE their stupid antics aren't going to appear normal to NORMAL people.

I hope they all drop dead, frankly. I'd like to see 'em lined up for the needle behind Westerfield. I think they're all fellow travelers.

These are NOT normal people. Of COURSE their stupid antics aren't going to appear normal to NORMAL people.

The party line for the "Westerfield Cult" now seems to be that EVERYONE was brainwashed by the jury. Everyone. Reality hasn't set in.

I suppose they are planning some bizarre "Save Dave" tactics now. But the rest of the United States is grateful that David Westerfield, child molestor is off the streets.

I hope they all drop dead, frankly. I'd like to see 'em lined up for the needle behind Westerfield. I think they're all fellow travelers.

This sort of people should be treated as terrorists. They enforce their jihads and sex proselytism in guerrilla style. It is so obvious, yet people want to treat them as regular criminals.... unbelievable.

...some of the Westerfield supporters were so vitriolic it just didn't seem normal. Think about it: They were defending a monster in human flesh. They flippantly dismissed the torture and rape of children on the hours and HOURS of child pornography as trivial.

I like this posting. I would say most of the Westerfield supporters are fundamentally selfish and this is what I mean: they enjoy the kick of self-importance, self-aggrandizement, power, or whatever it is, in pretending that they're superdectives able to piece the veil of reality, and this mystery-novel joy of intrigue overwhelms any serious, sober compassion of the real family and the real little girl that would provide a ballast for just flights of fancy. The fact that they can think so fancifully indicates to me a moral failure: to them the crime is not really real, but just a play thing, and so they can gleefully overlook stuff.

I've said it before but I'll say it again: take heart, this is not the stuff juries are made of. Juries have to carry the weight, the cross if you will, of the actual crime. Especially in a murder case, they are rarely so selfish. Almost always when a jury votes not guilty in a murder case, it's because the evidence is weak, not because they all think they're brilliant Sherlock Holmes types and want to use the jury as a forum to demonstrate their intellectual brilliance. Speaking to others here only confirms their version of reality. It's essentially narcisstic. I'm really not trying to name call here: I seriously think this is the human emotion from whence such ramblings come.