That is a piece to the puzzle.
That is a piece to the puzzle.
It is not a puzzler. If truth_seeker is correct, then I was correct on my posts last week.
Many, many of the posters on the forum who believed in DW were misconstruing the jury and their evidence requests. These posters were incorrectly thinking that the jury had considered murder/kidnapping then moved on to porn.
This discussion took place last Wed., I believe.
I pointed out that the porn evidence had been requested by the jury on Friday. Then Monday afternoon the Redden tape was requested, then the Redden transcript was requested Tuesday morning. I pointed out that therefore it stood to reason that the porn charge had been dealt with and they had moved on to the murder/kidnap charge.
Evidently, according to truth_seeker, they did indeed sign that verdict form on Tuesday as I had surmised.
Very simple and logical.
And you replied to me:
That is a piece to the puzzle.
Awe, shucks. I'm just another one of the lameheaded folks who couldn't possibly get it right, for I wasn't one of the self-annointed daily threadfollowing "experts."
FYI it was read in court today. Surprised you missed it.
I'll now quietly slink back into my media induced, ignorant stupor. Here is a little hint for you: a lot of folks followed the trial JUST AS CLOSELY AS THE SAVEDAVE GANG.
We drew different conclusions; the same ones the jury drew.