The prosecution said: here's a few specs (improperly photographed & never typed to see if it was blood) which contain van dam DNA, oh and here's a fibre that could maybe be from carpet that DVD encountered (but never mind that Ninja Dave was visited twice by three members of the VD household which could REASONABLY explain cross contamination) and there's a fingerprint (so she was in the motorhome but our trained dogs never alerted on the motorhome because they're obviously useless, right?). Here's our expert on bugs (but wait, don't listen to him when he reveals another hole in this charade we're putting on to stir your pre-disposition to convict "child killers" and "child rapists"--afterall we're only putting him on as a scientific expert when it helps, this is junk science if it helps Ninja Dave).
Explain to me again how we "case not proved" Freepers can't think straight?
I guess it does not fit your warped sense of logic, when the fact is that the defense attorney complimented the San Diego Police Department on their work and the evidence they presented.