Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marajade
What evidence was that?

  Let's start with allegations of police misconduct, not permitted. Then move on to the infamous phone call to the VanDams of Feb. 16, not permitted. Perhaps the requests for defense investigation of evidence in the VanDam house, not permitted.

  Basically, anything that may have served to produce an inference blaming the VanDams for Danielle's murder was not permitted into trial. The excuse was the Westerfield was the one on trial, not the VanDams. However, if his reasonable defense is that some one else - the VanDams - did it, this can create a mistrial. I suspect it will in this case.

Drew Garrett

353 posted on 08/21/2002 11:47:14 AM PDT by agarrett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]


To: agarrett
What police misconduct? What phone call? Was there misconduct involved in the collection of the hair, blood, or fingerprint evidence?
361 posted on 08/21/2002 11:49:45 AM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies ]

To: agarrett
Drew,

I hope you are right.
694 posted on 08/21/2002 5:00:15 PM PDT by domestice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson