Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
The chances of 12 people all coming to the conclusion of "not guilty" are very small

Opposite. The prosecution must prove beyond a shadow of a doubt. We had an open and shut case and still had to convince two jurors.

24 posted on 08/21/2002 10:16:26 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: AppyPappy
Fine. I don't really care. The players in the case, except for little Danielle, are so despicable they ought to all be in jail.
35 posted on 08/21/2002 10:22:04 AM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy
" The prosecution must prove beyond a shadow of a doubt."

If you served on a murder one jury, you should know it's reasonable doubt, not beyond a shadow of a doubt. Sounds like like an OJ jury.

50 posted on 08/21/2002 10:27:01 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy
The prosecution must prove beyond a shadow of a doubt.

Really? When did this change?? I thought it was beyond a REASONABLE doubt.

55 posted on 08/21/2002 10:28:46 AM PDT by small voice in the wilderness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy
The prosecution must prove beyond a shadow of a doubt.

In most states, the standard of proof in a criminal trial is "beyond a reasonable doubt."

67 posted on 08/21/2002 10:31:43 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy
The prosecution must prove beyond a shadow of a doubt.

Sorry, but it's beyond a "reasonable" doubt. Two different things.

120 posted on 08/21/2002 10:46:16 AM PDT by Veggie Todd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson