Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tallhappy
"Moreover, with U.S. forces deployed in the Persian Gulf, Washington may not be in a position to speedily come to the aid of Taiwan. "

Our 'special relationship entanglements' for war everywhere have become a suicide belt we have strapped around ourselves. Let Taiwan, Israel and the rest of the world fend for themselves. America can't survive, being the world's police dog.

The sun now sets on England as she bled herself to death with world involvement. Build fortress America. If someone attacks us, then smash them. If we have no favorites, we will have no enemies.

10 posted on 08/21/2002 8:48:03 AM PDT by ex-snook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ex-snook
Standing up against aggressors like the Soviet Union, Saddam Hussein, and Jiang Zemin is not having favorites. Nor is providing aid to Israel against aggressive neighbors like Syria.

I'll take the advice of Winston Churchill:
"If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed, if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a small chance of survival. There may even be a worse case: you may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves."
26 posted on 08/21/2002 9:23:31 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: ex-snook
Build fortress America.

At first, I rejected your words, because the friends that you mentioned need our support. After I read this, I can see your wisdom.

28 posted on 08/21/2002 9:35:04 AM PDT by gcraig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: ex-snook; hchutch
If we have no favorites, we will have no enemies.

Kind of like the Japanese, right?

The idea of a Fortress America, one which defends itself only when attacked, is foolishly naive. It would allow a powerful nation or coalition attain control over the people and resources of the Eastern Hemisphere, and allow it/them to attack us on their initiative (strategically, not tactically, speaking). Imagine if we had not opposed the Soviets from 1945 onwards - they'd have rolled over Europe in no time, then taken the Persian Gulf oil fields and ultimately taken the strategic mineral treasures of southern Africa (chromium, cobalt, etc.). Then they and the Chinese could've had a truly massive military to use in an assault on us, say in the 1960's.

We are a free people, and wealthy because of that freedom. That automatically makes enemies for us, some from jealousy, some from greed. That is the way of the world, and history confirms it. That being the case, I'd rather fight in my enemy's back yard before he's too powerful, than in my backyard when he's strong and can choose the time of the fight.

Notwithstanding the above, there is always the risk of "imperial overstretch." It affected Rome, England and a host of other nations and empires, all of which are gone. The US is not immune from this. But that doesn't mean that we have to, or should, run away from the world. It does mean that we should pick our fights carefully (and sometimes you can't pick a fight - it picks you).

42 posted on 08/21/2002 10:52:36 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson