Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Leisler
Paglia wants it both ways. She likes to preen about her glory days in the 60s and at the same time decry post-structuralism, the naive "misunderstanding of history" that flows logically from the very same period.

Paglia is a fun read, but she is wildly inconsistent. Like many of us, she bought into a whole lot of drivel in her youth, but even in late middle-age she can't bring herself to admit it. So she endlessly goes on about the hallowed 60s (it's a rare column when those days are not mentioned), but at the same time uses her rapier sharp mind to fillet the dunces who still take the politics of that time seriously.

Somehow Paglia's voice seems a little less forceful to me in these post-911 times. I'm not sure if it's because my perceptions of the world have altered radically, or if something in her voice has gone hollow. Maybe I just don't give a damn about fashionable straddlers like Paglia anymore.

26 posted on 08/20/2002 8:06:46 PM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: beckett
...but at the same time uses her rapier sharp mind to fillet the dunces who still take the politics of that time seriously.

Should be: ...the dunces who try to take the politics of that time into the present.

27 posted on 08/20/2002 8:13:30 PM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: beckett
Re your post #26, BTTT, beckett.
43 posted on 09/03/2002 2:52:00 AM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson