Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stand Watch Listen
Unfortunately, this rational argument has already been lost. I applaud the courage of the author to suggest only those who own property should vote on matters affecting property taxes. At the birth of this nation, only those who owned property could vote. Period. The curse of universal suffrage and majority rule is the people without property can vote themselves the property of others. That is exactly what they have done.
2 posted on 08/20/2002 8:02:41 AM PDT by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NoControllingLegalAuthority
Bump! Totally agree. The right to vote would then be another reward waiting for people if they improve their lot in life. The way it is now, the "net takers" can just vote for "wealth redistribution". If our court system had any cajones, then they would be protecting the right to ownership of income, property, estates handed down after death, etc. Instead, they spend their energy on helping the vote process for a bunch of retards who cannot even read simple instructions on a punch-card ballot.
3 posted on 08/20/2002 10:08:24 AM PDT by TheEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority
I applaud the courage of the author to suggest only those who own property should vote on matters affecting property taxes.

And what about those from other countries who own vast amounts of land in the U.S.?

Do we really want them voting?

8 posted on 08/21/2002 6:28:01 AM PDT by A2J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority
Unfortunately, this rational argument has already been lost. I applaud the courage of the author to suggest only those who own property should vote on matters affecting property taxes. At the birth of this nation, only those who owned property could vote. Period. The curse of universal suffrage and majority rule is the people without property can vote themselves the property of others. That is exactly what they have done.

Good observations. The rule that only property owners were be allowed to vote was based on the obvious fact that only those who pay taxes should have the privilege of voting for officers whose authority is such that they can levy taxes and spend the revenues gained for the state. Taxpayers were landowners in those early days before so many kinds of taxes were created.

That idea is still very valid; only those who pay taxes should have the privilege of voting for those who levy and spend tax revenues. Welfare recipients should not be allowed to become a bloc of voters.

The 14th through 17th amendments should all be rescinded in order to restore our republican form of government to its original design. The kind of government we have now, thanks to those four amendments, is that of a legislative democracy. That is not the form of government laid out in the original articles of the Constitution.

18 posted on 08/21/2002 9:08:20 AM PDT by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority
The curse of universal suffrage and majority rule is the people without property can vote themselves the property of others. That is exactly what they have done.

thats exactly what has happened... .

20 posted on 08/21/2002 2:08:03 PM PDT by Bill Davis FR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson