Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: summer; JulieRNR21; floriduh voter
gals,

Here is the letter to the editor that appeared in todays SHT, along with the rebuttal I just sent to the paper a few minutes ago.

Bush DCF appointee a mistake

The rush to appoint the head of a troubled child welfare agency without checking the man's extremist background is another example of bumbling Jeb Bush's poor judgment. The appointee to the Department of Children and Families, Jerry Regier, co-authored an essay supporting physical abuse of children, asserting that leaving bruises or welts does not constitute abuse.

This appointee should be dismissed immediately before further harm is done to Florida's children. Jeb Bush is not the leader Florida needs. Let's show him the exit in November.

This is too much.

Rachel Ferrell
Bradenton

***

Letters Editor, The Sarasota Herald-Tribune

Re: "Bush DCF appointee a mistake"

A letter printed in your 8/20/2002 edition, "Bush DCF appointee a mistake", was either a thinly veiled attack against Florida governor Jeb Bush and newly-appointed DCF chief, Jerry Regier, or, at best, a textbook example of the saying, " One person tells a falsehood and a hundred repeat it as true". This letter simply parrots false statements made in a Miami Herald story which, if anyone bothered to check the facts, reveals itself to be patently incorrect.

The report that Jerry Regier "co-authored an essay supporting physical abuse of children" is a lie. If this is so, how could the Oklahoma Chapter of the American Society for Public Administration (ASPA) name Jerry Regier as the 2001 Administrator of the Year? As Mike Thomas of the Orlando Sentinel wrote in his 8/20/2002 column, "Regier 'crisis' falters when facts known", this disinformation was simply found on the Internet somewhere and subsequently published as "truth" without allowing any time for Mr. Regier to respond. The Miami Herald did, however, manage to gather a verbal attack from Mr. Regier's political foes in Oklahoma. Mr. Regier himself has publicly issued a statement refuting these false claims. The actual record shows that he did not co-author the writing in question, nor did he exercise any editorial control over it's contents. In addition, he long ago disavowed any relationship with the publishing organization.

The title of another column refuting these unwarranted falsehoods regarding Mr. Regier, authored by Cheryl Wetzstein in the 8/20/200 Washington Times, succinctly sums up this whole situation in it's title, "Attacks on Regier seen as 'politics'". One quote in this article hits the nail squarely on the head: "This is just the politics of personal destruction, moving from Washington to Tallahassee".

"This is too much". Yes, indeed.

Joe Brower


17 posted on 08/20/2002 9:53:23 AM PDT by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Joe Brower
Re your post #17 - An A+ for you, sir. Fantastic letter.
18 posted on 08/20/2002 10:06:15 AM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Joe Brower
Super letter!
33 posted on 08/20/2002 3:09:52 PM PDT by windchime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Joe Brower
Great letter, Joe! Thanks!
GG
58 posted on 08/22/2002 7:28:58 PM PDT by Goldwater Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: summer; JulieRNR21; MeeknMing; Goldwater Girl; kinganamort; windchime
Folks, this is a follow-up to my letter to the editor that I put on this thread in post #17, along with the email exchanges I subsequently had with the letter's editor, which I have posted here at #59 & #68.

The SHT Printed my letter today! Knock me over with a feather.

It's titled "Stop misinformation on Regier". This, after Wendy Dial told me outright a week and a half ago that they would not print it. I emailed a thank-you note to the SHT's letter's editor (Wendy Dial) this morning, and I just got this reply back:

Joe,

I think what was bothering me initially about your letter was that an important man like Regier allowed his name to be used and to stay on something he allegedly didn't believe in. At some point he had to have agreed to allow his name to be used, but he was a fool if he didn't read what it went on (even if he didn't actually compose the articles which DID have his name on them). That wasn't misinformation, as you stated. His name WAS on the articles and he apparently hasn't sued or made any kind of a legal disclaimer.

So I guess the semantics of "authored" vs. had-his-name-on allowed your letter to pass muster, and there was a certain momentum to the stories on him that got ahead of his media disclaimer, as you noted. Some people aren't convinced he didn't mean it. You apparently aren't one of those, and we try to publish letters representing all views (except the nasty, utterly mean-spirited ones).

Besides, I'm not afraid to give letters a second and third look.

You're probably no more enlightened about the decision change than you were a minute ago. Oh well. On to tomorrow's 9/11 letters.

Sincerely,
Wendy Dial

***

Will wonders never cease. Let Freedom Ring,


83 posted on 09/10/2002 8:16:29 AM PDT by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson