[sourcery]

FYI

[Billthedrill]

Well, the good news is that it works - last year I got a quantum telegram from myself in the future. The bad news is that the "many universes" theory might be right - the telegram told me to buy Enron and WorldCom stock...

[martin_fierro]

.- .-.. .-.. / -.-- --- ..- .-. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . / .- .-. . / -... . .-.. --- -. --. / - --- / ..- ...

[Barry Goldwater]

I don't buy this one bit (pun intended). If the resultant field of a spinning particle is so strong it can couple at distances of light years, how can it be so selective to couple to one individual particle? Why aren't all spinning particles coupled and in instantaneous phase coherence? Why isn't the entire universe polarized and noise free? What stops another stronger particle from coupling over yours? The most fundamental question is - by what mechanism is this instantaneous transfer of energy? These guys can't even explain gravity. If energy could transfer instantaneously at great distances, how is it that it all the universe is self contained in the big bang? If you want real insight read Roland Dishington's "Physics".

[Technocrat]

Actually, if you use two bits of error correction you can just communicate digitally. What's the baud rate?

[Consort]

Einstein meant well. The speed of light is very slow when compared to the speed of other things. When we are able to identify those other things it will be very evident. We have a long way to go.