[stalin]

I meant to say that Clinton and Lay we'rn't pals other than business. OR should I say bribery. that's a kind of business I guess.

anyway hear the link

http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/02/17/bush.lay/

[HighWheeler]

Thanks for that link. It is virtual proof that Bush was not beholden to Lay. Not only was this written in February, but take a look at the liberal weasel words of inuendo. There isn't a single fact that any quid pro quo existed. So what was the link the dims have on Bush?

"Newly released documents suggest that President Bush's relationship with embattled former Enron Chairman Kenneth Lay was once chummy and that Lay often asked him to act on Enron's behalf when Bush was governor of Texas."

Not a nit of info that Bush did anything to help Enron

"Some two dozen letters written by Lay to then-Gov. Bush were among the 350 pages of Bush documents released..."

Again, nothing to implicate Bush. The Communists at CNN can only come up with THIS? More proof that Bush did nothing.