Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
The 4th Circuit Hamdis court agrees with me. They just sluff it off as a political question. In other words, if you don't like it, vote the president out or vote out the members of Congress out that gave the president his powers.

The government in the Pedilla writ didn't even address the issue, just technical questions.

213 posted on 08/19/2002 10:17:03 PM PDT by William Terrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]


To: William Terrell
Perhaps a writ of Habeas Corpus. Why no such write been filed on the case of the men detained after all this time? Or has there been, and it was disallowed by a tame federal judge. Such a writ doesn't have be filed by a lawyer, a next friend will do. The writ is simple and straight forward.

Remember this? I'm getting you up to snuff WT.

Hamdi was in the prison where Johnny Spann was beaten to death. Did you know that? The government has stated in court filings their particulars against Padilla including meetings with Al Qaeda in Pakistan.

My question is, how can you inquire about my mental state when you are not even minimally informed about the questions involved?

And by the way, the Fourth Circuit doesn't agree with you and even if they did why would it matter? You've already made clear that the they can't be trusted.

Nobody can be trusted except of course Padilla and Hamdi.

217 posted on 08/20/2002 5:47:44 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson