[Cultural Jihad]

Another good point. Regardless of why a home is broken, both parents have to made responsible for their children. That some women railroad some men is not an excuse to claim that child support laws are unconstitutional.

[Orangedog]

That some women railroad some men is not an excuse to claim that child support laws are unconstitutional.

Please show me where in the constitution the government is authorized to persecute, hound, and imprison any citicen for ANY debt. Please also show all of us where the constitution empowers the government to take one side in a divorce and use the threat of criminal sanction against the other side if that person does not do what the mother demands. Perhaps you can show us where women are designated as a special class that allows them to use a mans children as a means of emotional and finanacial extortion.

[RogerFGay]

Another good point. Regardless of why a home is broken, both parents have to made responsible for their children. That some women railroad some men is not an excuse to claim that child support laws are unconstitutional.

That's not the argument I've presented.

[RogerFGay]

Regardless of why a home is broken, both parents have to made responsible for their children.

You're presuming something from facts not in evidence. The facts contridict your presumption; have to be made responsible

Divorced Dads: Shattering the Myths

A Champion of Fatherhood