Posted on 08/16/2002 10:40:22 AM PDT by RogerFGay
In the dead of the night on June 20, 2001, Hartford's SWAT team circled a parking lot and an elementary school rooftop, trying to spot Catalino Morales and his fugitive partner from Pennsylvania.
When the fugitives were spotted between two cars on Plainfield Street, officers yelled, "Police, get down. Police, get down to the ground."
(Excerpt) Read more at ctnow.com ...
Don't know offhand, could be anyone of the founders, including Alexander Hamilton, but it is irrelevant, since the question here is not the right of the citizens to keep and bear arms, but is instead the non-existant right of wackos to murder law enforcement officers.
Please get psychiatric help. It is obvious that you are looking to go out in a blaze of glory, just like the other loonies we have been reading about recently. When that day comes, and the BATF and FBI guys are reading this thread, I would like them to note that, while there are a number of wackos here, it is a small number compared to all freepers, event though they make numerous ranting posts.
Yup, absolutely.
That's why they used to be able to manufacture such innovative lampshades in Germany.
GET A GRIP!!!
Grow a brain.
Sorry, your support of violent criminals makes it clear that you have no mental faculties whatsoever. As far as I am concerned, people who take the law into their own hands are outlaws, and should lose all of their civil rights. It is unfortunate that the courts have ended the declaration that a person outside the law is, in fact, an outlaw.
What are you smoking?
I make statements to point out the obvious fact that if any sufficiently large population is put under increasing pressure, some of its members will crack, and to your twisted little mind, that marks me as someone who "support[s] violent criminals"?
What exactly is your major malfunction?
As I said his identity is irrelevant, since the topic of this thread is not the 2nd Amendment, but is actually the support of violent anarchists. Sacco and Vanzetti were earlier examples of this type, and their treatment was appropriate.
You ride in here on your fat white piggie, laying down the law, dictating to us peons what is and is not on topic, what is or is not relevant, what is or is not...
Damn, where the hell did I leave that DSM? I can almost remember your page number.
In any case, thanks for the laughs.
It is also true that in a sufficiently lage population idiots will crack for no reason whatsoever. By attempting to minimize this guy's responsibility for his actions you give him support, just as those who claim that the homicide bombers in Israel are doing what they do because of some sort of action on the part of Israel give them support. Evil doers are responsible for the evil that they do. Being responsible for your actions is part of being a free individual.
As it happens you anarchists are not the only ones allowed to have an opinion. It is not surprising that under the skin of many so called libertarians lies a Nazi, ready to deny others the rights they claim for themselves. Well buddy, this country dealt with your kind in Germany in 1945, and your support for the murderous idiots who shoot at the defenders of the public safety marks you as an enemy of the people of the United States.
You continue to amaze me with your incredible knack for mischaracterizing virtually everything. For you to accuse a Jewish Christian Republican of being a Libertarian Anarchist is laughable. That you would accuse this JCR of it is gut-wrenchingly hilarious, in light of my history of standing up to the true Libertarian Anarchists who infest Free Republic.
If I were a lesser man, I'd ping some of them to this thread so that they could administer a sound thrashing to anyone fool enough to try placing me in their camp!
Nice try, Luci.
Thanks for playing.
First off, I am not minimizing his responsibility for his actions, I am merely explaining what happens when a random sampling of people are put through the meatgrinder.
But if you insist that your logic holds, I would then have to conclude that I'm supporting the actions of trolls every time I reply to you.
For a Jewish Christian Republican to compare the US legal system to that of people who made lampshades from the skins of our relatives is despicable.
The metaphor is painfully accurate. Lives destroyed are lives destroyed. And when both atrocities are committed under color of law, the obscenity is plain to see.
So the US is Nazi Germany, and presumably President Bush is Adolf Hitler! I have to say that on this sort of thing you are more in agreement with libertarian anarchists I have disputed in many places on these forums, whatever your opinions on other matters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.