Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: crazykatz; Kevin Curry; Travis McGee; holyscroller; Romulus; F16Fighter
Much as the pro-perversion moral-liberals used to rant about the sacred privacy of behind closed, hallowed doors, and therefore just legalize pornography and sexual deviancy. A generation later we see the terrible results of this non-judgmentalism of sexual immorality. Whether it's the need for a V-chip, or spam filters to keep out email porn, and now this act of copulation in the Cathedral. It has inundated our whole culture now. "You are obsessed about it," the moral-liberals would claim. But really, that is what we are supposed to be. You can't walk down the street anymore without it slapping you in the face every day, from the TV, the advertisers, the mass media, the schools and universities, even Disneyland! The libertarians like to mouth off about the "law of unintended consequences" but ignore the unintended consequences of the moral-liberalism which they champion and whose results we see in the shocking and dreadful news each and every day.
423 posted on 08/16/2002 11:59:08 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies ]


To: Cultural Jihad; crystalk
I spend much time reading about the suffering of Christians all over the world. The suffering is on the increase.

I also believe that the forcing of Christians to "accept" being insulted and their institutions ridiculed, is also a form of persecution.

Granted, nobody died as a result nor were they physically assaulted. However, their FAITH was assaulted...and to a Christian, that is just as bad!!

Satan must be a liberal...liberals tolerate most of the horrid attacks on the FAITH of Christians of this world.

This event in the Church was NOT funny. IT WAS A FORM OF PERSECUTION.

425 posted on 08/17/2002 12:21:50 AM PDT by crazykatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies ]

To: Cultural Jihad
Much as the pro-perversion moral-liberals used to rant about the sacred privacy of behind closed, hallowed doors, and therefore just legalize pornography and sexual deviancy. A generation later we see the terrible results of this non-judgmentalism of sexual immorality.

I remember when Clinton's Perversion General Jocelyn Elders was pitching to have the public schools teach courses on masturbation and some conservatives expressed outrage. Her response? She said her critics were Victorian prudes, that the problem with our country was that there is too little public discussion and celebration of sex.

That she could make such an accusation with a straight face in our sex-saturated Whoreywood-MTV-Madonna-Rodman-Hustler-Clinton-Lewinsky-Dr. Ruth-Orlando Gay Days popular culture is a testament to her stupidity. But she isn't atypical. Almost every proponent of public perversity alleges that we are not open enough about sex in this country.

Their agenda has nothing to do with making the private bedroom safe. They seek nothing less than to paint their lurid perversions across every public forum in the country. They would like to have the government force us to watch and--if possible--force us to applaud.

445 posted on 08/17/2002 4:04:39 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson