Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Phillip Augustus
Second World refered to nations with command economies. The first, second and third world terminologies were developed during Cold War to describe political alignments. China and Russia were both considered part of the Second World. The third world back than was non aligned nations many of them recently independent colonies that were fought over by the first and second world. Nowadays third world is just used to describe dirt poor nations.
260 posted on 08/19/2002 9:29:06 PM PDT by Classicaliberalconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]


To: Classicaliberalconservative
Why, then, were non-aligned nations such as Finland, Sweden, and Switzerland still considered First World? And why were certain nations (North Vietnam, to name merely one example) who were clearly aligned on one side or the other still considered Third World?

You are generally correct in defining what Third World means today, but, even under definition, I would like to see any link indicating that Romania and Belarus and Russia are Third World nations. Mind you, even if they are, they are still part of Western Civilization. I'll get back with you in a day or two on that one.;)

299 posted on 08/20/2002 6:58:20 PM PDT by Phillip Augustus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson