Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'If attacked, Israel might nuke Iraq'
Etherzone.com | August 15, 2002 | Ze'ev Schiff

Posted on 08/15/2002 9:33:30 AM PDT by 1bigdictator

'If attacked, Israel might nuke Iraq'

By Ze'ev Schiff

If Iraq strikes at Israel with non-conventional weapons, causing massive casualties among the civilian population, Israel could respond with a nuclear retaliation that would eradicate Iraq as a country. This grave assessment, from American intelligence, was presented last week to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

During the 1991 Gulf War, then U.S. defense secretary Richard Cheney, now vice-president, told CNN that Israel could respond with nuclear weapons to an Iraqi strike that included the use of chemical weapons. This assessment has only been strengthened since then, because according to all the signs, Iraq now has biological weapons that could cause mass casualties.

According to one assessment, military-grade biological weapons can be almost as lethal as a nuclear bomb.

The U.S. intelligence assessments include an analysis of possible Israeli responses. The lowest probability is that Israel would respond initially with a conventional military retaliation if it is slightly harmed, and would add a warning that a non-conventional response was possible if the Iraqi attacks on the Israeli civilian population continued.

The possibility of Israel using nuclear weapons against Iraq appears in a document submitted by military expert Dr. Anthony Cordesman, a fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Presumably, the document is based, in part, on official administration assessments.

In the worst case scenario, writes Cordesman, Israel could face an existential threat to important urban areas such as Tel Aviv or Haifa. Under such conditions, it would threaten nuclear retaliation against Iraqi cities and military forces to cease the [Iraqi] attack.

If the Iraqi attack were to continue, and there was a lethal biological strike on an Israeli city, Israel would certainly respond with nuclear strikes against Iraqi cities that were not yet in the hands of American forces, Cordesman says. Such an Israeli reaction could destroy Iraq as a state.

Based on this assessment and the possibility of an Israeli retaliation in the event of an Iraqi strike, it is presumed that the United States will, at the earliest stages, make a special effort to neutralize any possible use of Scud and El Hussein rockets that Iraq positions in its western regions, as it did in the Gulf War, for a more convenient launching site for attacks against Israel. During discussions in Washington, Israeli representatives asked the United States to take action against the missiles in western Iraq.

The Americans know that Iraq is not depending only on long-range missiles in its plans for using chemical or biological weapons against its enemies, including Israel. As part of its preparations, Iraq has also been working on developing pilotless planes. Unlike the usual development of drones used primarily for intelligence gathering purposes, the Iraqis are working on normal-sized planes loaded with chemical or biological weapons and intended to be flown by remote control. They are working on an Eastern European training plane and on a version of the MiG-21. Both planes have been tested.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: america; iraq; israel; nuclearresponse; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-143 next last
To: mhking
No Nukes!

Too late.

I think we've passed the "if" point, and are now looking at the "when" and "who."

I hope you are wrong!

41 posted on 08/15/2002 10:40:30 AM PDT by makoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #42 Removed by Moderator

To: makoman
I hope you are wrong!

So do I, my friend, so do I.

43 posted on 08/15/2002 10:41:32 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: kdoxxx
But calling Iraq a threat to the US is stretching things.

I'll remember that when Kansas City or Indianapolis or Richmond is levelled by one of their bombs.

44 posted on 08/15/2002 10:43:40 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jack-A-Roe
You're exactly right. Saddam knows he's a goner, so of course he's going to kill as many Israelis as he can before he goes. Nuclear deterrence means absolutely nothing.

He'll take down as many Americans as he can too. If he has pre-positioned biological weapons in the U.S., they will be used.

Unless we get real lucky, this is going to be very ugly.

45 posted on 08/15/2002 10:44:32 AM PDT by EternalHope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Faraday
I never said we supplied them. I said, "as soon as it came out that we supplied them .." My guess is that will be the lead story on al-Jazeera. Which every Muslim will believe, as they did lesser stories. Do you think the propagandized Muslim world believes that the Iraeli's are smart enough to develop their own?
46 posted on 08/15/2002 10:50:27 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SunStar
Korea and Vietnam were pretty big battles, and part of the Cold War/WWIII.

I thought about mentioning them. Obviously, they were not big enough for some people to realize that it was part of a larger war effort. I'm not trying to be saracastic (okay, I'm not trying to be TOO sarcastic.)
But this war against Islam is not the third world war.
47 posted on 08/15/2002 10:51:10 AM PDT by dyed_in_the_wool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: LibWhacker
Peace is possible in the Mid East


49 posted on 08/15/2002 10:54:43 AM PDT by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: kdoxxx
They have no missles capable of reaching us

So you think we should go after North Korea, eh?
50 posted on 08/15/2002 10:55:40 AM PDT by dyed_in_the_wool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
LOL. I'm saving that one.
51 posted on 08/15/2002 10:57:42 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: 1bigdictator
Shower western Iraq with EMP bombs to fry the electronics of the Scuds. Boom! Boom! Out go the lights! The missles will sit on their launch platforms and rust.
52 posted on 08/15/2002 10:58:43 AM PDT by Freakazoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #53 Removed by Moderator

To: dyed_in_the_wool
Yeah I can understand where your coming from, afterall we did help to defeat the U.S.S.R. & tear down her wall. But in all honesty that was a Monetary war & covert operation, this one will be fought with some pretty serious weapons & therefore heavy casualties. WW III or IV, either way the $hit's fixing to hit the fan.
54 posted on 08/15/2002 11:13:56 AM PDT by HELLRAISER II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: zhabotinsky
Benighted, oh please. If that's all you can come up with.....
55 posted on 08/15/2002 11:13:59 AM PDT by bluester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: dyed_in_the_wool
10-4 on that!
56 posted on 08/15/2002 11:15:35 AM PDT by HELLRAISER II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jack-A-Roe
Neither does he care how many of his Arab brothers & sisters he takes with him as well.
57 posted on 08/15/2002 11:17:16 AM PDT by HELLRAISER II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bluester
Dissent is tolerated. There is simply counter-dissent. Your posts haven't been deleted, have they? Criticism is not censorship.
58 posted on 08/15/2002 11:18:59 AM PDT by Britton J Wingfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Britton J Wingfield
Yes I know that. I wasn't talking about censorhip. I have absolutely no such problems.

I never thought that opposing nuclear attacks would consider me "problematic" anywhere and that supporting it has become a normal thing. That's what worries me in a way.

59 posted on 08/15/2002 11:34:30 AM PDT by bluester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

Comment #60 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson