Skip to comments.
'If attacked, Israel might nuke Iraq'
Etherzone.com
| August 15, 2002
| Ze'ev Schiff
Posted on 08/15/2002 9:33:30 AM PDT by 1bigdictator
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-143 next last
To: mhking
No Nukes! Too late.
I think we've passed the "if" point, and are now looking at the "when" and "who."
I hope you are wrong!
41
posted on
08/15/2002 10:40:30 AM PDT
by
makoman
Comment #42 Removed by Moderator
To: makoman
I hope you are wrong!So do I, my friend, so do I.
43
posted on
08/15/2002 10:41:32 AM PDT
by
mhking
To: kdoxxx
But calling Iraq a threat to the US is stretching things.I'll remember that when Kansas City or Indianapolis or Richmond is levelled by one of their bombs.
44
posted on
08/15/2002 10:43:40 AM PDT
by
mhking
To: Jack-A-Roe
You're exactly right. Saddam knows he's a goner, so of course he's going to kill as many Israelis as he can before he goes. Nuclear deterrence means absolutely nothing. He'll take down as many Americans as he can too. If he has pre-positioned biological weapons in the U.S., they will be used.
Unless we get real lucky, this is going to be very ugly.
To: Faraday
I never said we supplied them. I said, "as soon as it came out that we supplied them .." My guess is that will be the lead story on al-Jazeera. Which every Muslim will believe, as they did lesser stories. Do you think the propagandized Muslim world believes that the Iraeli's are smart enough to develop their own?
To: SunStar
Korea and Vietnam were pretty big battles, and part of the Cold War/WWIII.
I thought about mentioning them. Obviously, they were not big enough for some people to realize that it was part of a larger war effort. I'm not trying to be saracastic (okay, I'm not trying to be TOO sarcastic.)
But this war against Islam is not the third world war.
Comment #48 Removed by Moderator
To: LibWhacker
Peace is possible in the Mid East
49
posted on
08/15/2002 10:54:43 AM PDT
by
ASA Vet
To: kdoxxx
They have no missles capable of reaching us
So you think we should go after North Korea, eh?
To: ASA Vet
LOL. I'm saving that one.
To: 1bigdictator
Shower western Iraq with EMP bombs to fry the electronics of the Scuds. Boom! Boom! Out go the lights! The missles will sit on their launch platforms and rust.
Comment #53 Removed by Moderator
To: dyed_in_the_wool
Yeah I can understand where your coming from, afterall we did help to defeat the U.S.S.R. & tear down her wall. But in all honesty that was a Monetary war & covert operation, this one will be fought with some pretty serious weapons & therefore heavy casualties. WW III or IV, either way the $hit's fixing to hit the fan.
To: zhabotinsky
Benighted, oh please. If that's all you can come up with.....
55
posted on
08/15/2002 11:13:59 AM PDT
by
bluester
To: dyed_in_the_wool
10-4 on that!
To: Jack-A-Roe
Neither does he care how many of his Arab brothers & sisters he takes with him as well.
To: bluester
Dissent is tolerated. There is simply counter-dissent. Your posts haven't been deleted, have they? Criticism is not censorship.
To: Britton J Wingfield
Yes I know that. I wasn't talking about censorhip. I have absolutely no such problems.
I never thought that opposing nuclear attacks would consider me "problematic" anywhere and that supporting it has become a normal thing. That's what worries me in a way.
59
posted on
08/15/2002 11:34:30 AM PDT
by
bluester
Comment #60 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-143 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson