To: He Rides A White Horse
It used to be that the enormous social stigma of having a child out of wedlock would be more than sufficient to scare hormonally-charged youngsters into waiting until marriage.
Now, thanks to the rise of anti-family socialism and the free-loving sixties, not only is having illegitimate children permitted, it's encouraged!
Can there be anything more vile than organizations, like Planned Parenthood, that actually make money from the destruction of the family?
33 posted on
08/14/2002 7:44:46 PM PDT by
j271
To: j271; punkit
It used to be that the enormous social stigma of having a child out of wedlock would be more than sufficient to scare hormonally-charged youngsters into waiting until marriage.Should it be accepted? No. Would I ever call a child born out of wedlock a bastard? No way.
People make mistakes. Especially kids. I'm not going to label somebody a whore because of a mistake, because they had a weak moment.
What I refuse to do is grant people like punkit a license to exploit children who have made a mistake.
To: j271; punkit
It used to be that the enormous social stigma of having a child out of wedlock would be more than sufficient to scare hormonally-charged youngsters into waiting until marriage. What I'm trying to say j271 is that these things have been around for ever. We've never been about sending people to Hell; it's always been the converse.
Punkit smugly formulates a response that suggests that if one's child gets preganant in the first place, then perhaps Planned Parenthood is more fit to make these decisions.
You know what punkit, drop the 'it' from your screenname, and that's what you are. A punk.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson