Skip to comments.
Make liberals safe, legal and rare (ANN COULTER)
worldnetdaily ^
| August 14, 2002
| Ann Coulter
Posted on 08/14/2002 5:04:42 PM PDT by anncoulteriscool
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-114 next last
To: anncoulteriscool
"Why not make smoking "safe, legal and rare" just like abortion? "
If the Pols keep it up, it will not only be easier but CHEAPER to have an abortion.
21
posted on
08/14/2002 5:30:48 PM PDT
by
brat
To: section9
the exception of drug use, which is encouraged by probitive laws,Please expand on this. And does this apply to other
crimes than drug use?
22
posted on
08/14/2002 5:31:11 PM PDT
by
gcruse
To: anncoulteriscool
what's wrong with y'all?
slackers.
To: anncoulteriscool
bump
24
posted on
08/14/2002 5:33:55 PM PDT
by
Selara
To: glock rocks
slackers?
Nah, my money's on pushups.(ducking and running, feverishly adorning flamesuit)
To: anncoulteriscool
"Of course we all agree Ann is swell..." bump
26
posted on
08/14/2002 5:41:08 PM PDT
by
ibbryn
To: glock rocks
Thanks for the pictures. I almost forgot what she looks like.
As if THAT could ever happen!
To: anncoulteriscool
Liberalism has no logical consistency and that's why their arguments always boiling to: If you agree with my view you're obviously an intelligent forward looking thinker, if you don't, you're obviously somekind of ignoramus troglodyte who ought to crawl back under the rock from which you came. It's this inconsistency and intellectual dishonesty which is always the dead giveaway. What would be pitiful if it wasn't a serious thing is that they're totally unaware of this. I remember listening to a public radio program and a woman called in and basically said that no way could she ever support a candidate that was for the death penalty and didn't support a woman's right to choose. My reaction was, dear lady is there some underlying moral principle which supports you taking such stances. I mean I can see anti-death penalty, pro-life or death penalty, pro-choice or death penalty, pro-life. But that latter choice--I don't think so.
To: glock rocks
The woman is brilliant!
And those LEGS!!!!
)8-])
To: anncoulteriscool
...Liberal clergy at the NYT....
Sweeeeet!
30
posted on
08/14/2002 5:57:16 PM PDT
by
dasboot
To: glock rocks
New wallpaper!
31
posted on
08/14/2002 5:59:22 PM PDT
by
dasboot
To: gcruse; anncoulteriscool
"One proven method of making something "rare" is to make it illegal."One proven method of making something "rare" is to make it a governmental monopoly.
Good education in public school. Good mail service. Safe streets. Sound retirement plan in Social Security. Sound dollar.
32
posted on
08/14/2002 6:04:44 PM PDT
by
Kermit
To: anncoulteriscool
Would Ann Coulter have any material if the New York Times shut down for a month? I love her columns but it seems as if nearly every one of them boils down to lambasting something she read in the Times.
It's like shooting fish in a barrel. With an AK-47. Repeatedly. For once, can she nuke the idiots at the Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, The Boston Globe, USA Today, Newsweek, Time Magazine, CBS News, CNN, ABC News, PBS....?
There is so much more liberal nonsense out there in the world besides the New York Times, Ann. You need to expand your horizons.
To: anncoulteriscool; EternalVigilance; Gelato; usconservative; Hunble; RnMomof7
Of course, we all agree that abortion should be "rare." That's why all reasonable regulations of abortion must be fought against like wild banshees! (One proven method of making something "rare" is to make it illegal.) Their comically counterintuitive positions are inevitably backed up with long, complicated explanations about the dire risk of encouraging "hard-liners," the enemy's "paranoia," or clever points such as "teenagers will have sex anyway." The arguments not only make no sense ab initio, but openly contradict one another.
Hey, anncoulteriscool, I love your screename!
To: Tall_Texan
There is so much more liberal nonsense out there in the world besides the New York Times, Ann. You need to expand your horizons. Isn't it pathetic that we have only one frail (from looking at her) female carrying the flag when we supposedly have a whole freaking Republican party that can't get out of the fetal position? Sad indeed. That's why I will be voting AGAINST my Republican Congressman in a couple of weeks.
35
posted on
08/14/2002 6:20:52 PM PDT
by
jackbill
To: gcruse
Please expand on this. And does this apply to other crimes than drug use?
Drug use tends to start in the teenage years, when feeligs of rebellion against authority coincide with raging hormonal activity. The "War on Drugs" is a political attempt to solve an insoluble problem, drug use. I'll be honest with you. I don't have a solution, but I do know that legalization is not the answer. But I do know that blanket prohibition has done nothing to solve the problem.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
36
posted on
08/14/2002 6:27:06 PM PDT
by
section9
To: anncoulteriscool
To: anncoulteriscool
Hear, hear!! Let's be pro-choice: Abort Democrats safely, legally, and on-demand!
To: anncoulteriscool
That's why all reasonable regulations of abortion must be fought against like wild banshees! (One proven method of making something "rare" is to make it illegal.) I love ya Ann, but... making something illegal does not, per se, make it "rare". E.g., drugs and booze during "proabition" era. That is not a good argument. But, I still love ya.
39
posted on
08/14/2002 6:47:27 PM PDT
by
mc5cents
To: section9
Here's a clue to solving the drug problem:
"While pretending to oppose drug use, the New York Times has supported programs to give addicts needles, referring in a 1998 editorial to "some interesting new ideas" such as "needle exchanges." In the case of cigarettes, however, liberals enthusiastically embrace the otherwise mystifying concept of punishing bad behavior."
Make the war on drugs look like the war on smokers. Make it all legal and then villify the now law abiding users as scum of the earth pariahs, just like they're doing with smokers.
40
posted on
08/14/2002 6:50:20 PM PDT
by
GBA
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-114 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson