Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A High-Tech Lynching: ABC News, The FBI, And The Greendale School Myth
Toogood Reports ^ | August 14, 2002 | Nicholas Stix

Posted on 08/14/2002 5:05:04 AM PDT by Starmaker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Common Tator
So does Hatfill have an alibi for the periods in question? Your response doesn't say he does nor does it say he doesn't. It only points to a conclusion that only real criminals have alibis, but because Hatfill is not a criminal, he doesn't have an alibi. He could, at least, give some generalized answers to where he was during the dates in question, for example, "I went to work on those days" or "I was off job-hunting in ________" or "I was taking a few vacation days and just puttered around the apartment."

21 posted on 08/14/2002 7:38:01 AM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
his attorney and his spinner didn't provide any information about where he was on the dates in question.

He may not necessarily have stuffed and mailed the envelopes himself. The question I would ask is how did that unique strain of anthrax get from Ft. Detrick into the hands of the terrorists? Could he possibly have crossed paths with some swarthy ones during the years he spent in Africa before returning to the U.S. in '95? Al Qaeda and other radical Egyptian islamic groups have had a very strong presence in Africa. He also spent time in Florida. This is a vey complex case. I'm keeping an open mind on him until all the facts are in. Even now after he's gone public and blasted the FBI, they are still not backing off of him. Yesterday and today they have been showing his picture around Princeton. This surprises me considering the harsh criticism they took following his press conference and the comparisons to the Jewel case.

22 posted on 08/14/2002 7:58:38 AM PDT by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj
He may not necessarily have stuffed and mailed the envelopes himself. The question I would ask is how did that unique strain of anthrax get from Ft. Detrick into the hands of the terrorists? Could he possibly have crossed paths with some swarthy ones during the years he spent in Africa before returning to the U.S. in '95? Al Qaeda and other radical Egyptian islamic groups have had a very strong presence in Africa. He also spent time in Florida. This is a vey complex case. I'm keeping an open mind on him until all the facts are in. Even now after he's gone public and blasted the FBI, they are still not backing off of him. Yesterday and today they have been showing his picture around Princeton. This surprises me considering the harsh criticism they took following his press conference and the comparisons to the Jewel case.

There are many unanswered questions in this case and Hatfill is not the only "person of interest." I'm also not willing to convict him or exonerate him, especially based on a well-spun press conference in which he tried to position himself as Richard Jewell. It played to that "root for the underdog" mentality. But I do want answers to my question, your questions, and many other questions, before I let *anyone* off the hook. And I doubt if one press conference is going to have the investigation into Hatfill dropped.

And as far as showing Hatfill's picture around Princeton, according to the Trenton Times, they've also set up a temporary command post in Princeton. I have a feeling they're doing more than just showing a picture around Nassau Street and Palmer Square.

23 posted on 08/14/2002 8:09:55 AM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
I'm also not willing to convict him or exonerate him, especially based on a well-spun press conference in which he tried to position himself as Richard Jewell.

I completely agree. I might have totally given him a pass if it weren't for the fact that the anthrax strain has been narrowed down to Ames/Ft. Detrick.

24 posted on 08/14/2002 8:32:07 AM PDT by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
NO INNOCENT PERSON would have a 72 hour alibi. Innocent people do not have specific memories and records of where they were when a crime was committed...

Nonsense. Mainly, you don't have to rely on your memory, if you're given a chance. Maybe you were on vacation or a business trip. Maybe a glance at your monthly credit card bill would remind you that it was a weekend and you were shopping all day long at the Outlet Mall. Maybe you can make the rounds of your favorite chat sites that remind you that you were working late that night and goofing around on the internet.

I will grant that you probably can't nail down an entire 72-hour period via credit card recipts, long-distance phone calls, dates you wrote checks to pay your bills, random internet postings, but it certainly is not impossible for the combination to preclude certain suspected activities.

25 posted on 08/14/2002 10:01:28 AM PDT by jiggyboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Peach; Catspaw; Quilla; ravingnutter; aristeides; Common Tator; snopercod
See: FBI and Anthrax: Another TWA 800 in the Making?, NewsMax.com, August 14, 2002, by Phil Brennan (posted by Mohammed El-Shahawi).
26 posted on 08/14/2002 10:58:27 AM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj; Catspaw
What makes you think the strain of anthrax was unique to Ft. Detrick? Wasn't it shipped to labs all over the world?
27 posted on 08/14/2002 11:08:29 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
I just read that article minutes ago. Thanks for the heads up.
28 posted on 08/14/2002 11:11:01 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
What makes you think the strain of anthrax was unique to Ft. Detrick? Wasn't it shipped to labs all over the world?

I recall reading that Porton Down was under the microscope as well but was later cleared. I believe the Florida and NY anthrax samples both were the the Ames strain which was stored only at Fort Detrick. I will check for a reference on that.

29 posted on 08/14/2002 11:17:46 AM PDT by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
What "inflexible" features of the plan, would have committed the perp to the strike upon the National Enquirer, or was it the inflexibility of the perp? Or both?

A very good question. Another possibility: The perp is psychotic, and the choice was based on something he/she saw in the checkout line that day.

30 posted on 08/14/2002 2:43:19 PM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: snopercod; ladyinred; JeanS; redrock; Squantos
Yep.

The targets in the attacks, September 11th and subsequent to the spread of the Antrhax "devices," are what would be typically seen most through the "media lenses:"

CNN

American Media, Inc. publications

... and a few others, NBC, and such.


31 posted on 08/14/2002 2:59:45 PM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy
"Nonsense. Mainly, you don't have to rely on your memory, if you're given a chance. Maybe you were on vacation or a business trip. Maybe a glance at your monthly credit card bill would remind you that it was a weekend and you were shopping all day long at the Outlet Mall.

My take on the meaning of the term "alibi" is that it is NOT just where you say you were at a given time but where you verifiably say you were at that time. This may be CT's take, as well. That is, being home alone all day is NOT an alibi, but being home with your family who will all support your claim, is. Shopping at the mall is not an alibi unless someone else remembers seeing you there at the time. I believe this is how the LEs define "alibi" as well. It's not just where you claim you were at a given time but what you can support with witnesses or timed sales slips or timed parking receipts, telephone call records, etc.

32 posted on 08/15/2002 7:12:21 AM PDT by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson