[Maelstrom]

Sorry wimpycat, I have no idea what transpired. For all I know, the cop told him that his 'poison ideology' was sufficient grounds for the cop to kill him and claim self-defense. OR...Matthews could have sped along that particular stretch of highway specifically so he could murder a cop some miles farther away. I don't see any way to hold an opinion like you can.

I do NOT believe that Mathews killed anyone over a speeding ticket.

OPH:
It's obvious that what you consider a 'poison ideology' is any ideology that would strictly limit the government to it's enumerated powers.

It's an ad hominem attack, and I don't know how you can expect people not to think less of you for it.

[wimpycat]

How about answering my question in #17, which is:

Whose actions do you think were the more justified, Matthews' or the cops?

[decimon]

It's obvious that what you consider a 'poison ideology' is any ideology that would strictly limit the government to it's enumerated powers.

I'm for a strictly limited government and I've encountered a few nasty cops and troopers. But they didn't try to kill me and I never considered killing them.

I do NOT believe that Mathews killed anyone over a speeding ticket.

Is there some clue as to what you do believe happened?