Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kattracks
I'm caught between two thoughts:
The first is outrage that the media is publishing items like this ...
The second is that the military is smart enough to only use existing MSC capabilities during a build-up so as not to tip-off the enemy...
Actual plans and thus a security breach? Intentional misinformation? Any thoughts?
19 posted on 08/13/2002 5:48:40 AM PDT by BlueNgold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BlueNgold
Not sure if this is actually a security brief. If the DoD doesn't have the heavy shipping assets to move the gear, then they are forced to use commercial shipping. And with the demise of our in-country Merchant Marine shipping we are almost forced to rely on global corporations like SeaLand.

Sure, the DoD can try to keep the lid on chartering SeaLands largest oceangoing transit vessel, but it's really like asking them to keep fuel purchases on the open market a secret. People WILL know that the 5 million gallons of fuel is not available for other customers - someone has bought it. When the DoD charters a half-dozen vessels like this - the equivalent of millions of tons of commercial shipping, someone is going to know. It's all part of doing business in the global economic world.

What this points to once again is the fact that our military and our national logistical support is in perilous waters. Bush and Rumsfeld are fooling themselves if they think we can rebuild our military to 1992 levels in only 18 months time.

59 posted on 08/13/2002 1:30:12 PM PDT by fogarty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson