I don't have proof, my question is, if you were in law enforcement dedicated to protecting the public,would not the Hammad connection to the WTC warrant an investigation into why he was in the WTC, why a letter from a man using an alias from a non-existent company was presented in court to explain his WTC connection?
Would it be unreasonable to interview Mr.Daviddenko and ask who hired his non-existent company to work on the sprinklers in the WTC? Normally, all work on sprinklers was overseen by the Port Authority, but not Denko Mechanical's work.
What would Occam's Razor tell you about Ms. Smith being burned alive with gasoline in Mr.Odtllah's car?
First off, is the company actually nonexistent? I've seen three different versions of this. (Nonexistent, exists but was not hired, exists and was legitimately hired.)
The level of knowledge needed to sabotage the WTC sprinklers far exceeds what an unlicensed plumber would have available to him, even if he was working on the building.
Would it be unreasonable to interview Mr.Daviddenko and ask who hired his non-existent company to work on the sprinklers in the WTC? Normally, all work on sprinklers was overseen by the Port Authority, but not Denko Mechanical's work.
No, Mister David Denko (I'm willing to bet that's your problem right there) is the LAST guy I'd interview--I'd go through the Port Authority's contracts office and review the official records, instead.
What would Occam's Razor tell you about Ms. Smith being burned alive with gasoline in Mr.Odtllah's car?
Nothing--except that she burned to death in Mr. Odtllah's car.
You seem desperate for this to come off like a very bad Hollywood movie. There are other connections on the WTC that are far more likely to be remunerative to investigators.
Sorry, but airplanes hitting the towers are more than enough to explain why the sprinklers failed.