[sauropod]

Gonna disagree with you H. neo-cons insisted that everybody vote for W. "to bring honor and decency back to the oval office."

What have we got for it? I already delineated above how W. has approved legislation that is abhorrant to any conservative i personally know.

Some choice. No political correctness here, merely an observation.

[who knows what evil?]

Just got my RNC fundraising letter in the mail chastising me for "abandoning the Republican Party" because I haven't made a contribution as of yet. (Never have...not sure why I get a membership card every year, and fundraising letters, to boot.) I returned their solicitation in the envelope provided, explaining that "I am a conservative, not a Republican". Think they'll get the message?

[Hugin]

Sure Bush has signed some bills that I disagree with. I never expected that I would always agree with Bush, or any politician for that matter. But I do think he has brought "honor and decency back to the oval office."

That really wasn't my point though. My point is it's easy to rail against neo-cons without mentioning names, then label whoever disagrees on a particular issue a "neo-con". It's like if I wrote an article criticizing "neo-confederates" who wish the south had won and there was no USA. Then I could accuse anyone who opposes any expansion of federal power of being a "neo-confed".