Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MissAmericanPie
Yes, I believe he was voted in twice without massive voting fraud. In 92 he had Perot to split the Republican vote. The lie they tell with this is that more Dems voted for Perot than Repubs. I believe that to be a lie. In 96, with Bob Dole the candidate, BillyBob walked all over him. In the first debate with Dole, a woman asked both a question. Clinton did everything but bed her right on the stage.
72 posted on 08/12/2002 4:30:32 AM PDT by 7thson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: 7thson
I'm sorry but I don't think your getting my point. Do you really think that 2000 was the first time Demoncrats stuffed the ballot boxes? Or was it just the first time they got caught? Look at the 5,000 more votes in New Mexico than there were registered voters, look at the ballot box lids found floating in San Francisco Bay, look at the polls held open late and illegally. Look at Hillarys sudden victory in NYC when the other guy was ahead in the polls for so long.

I'm saying that they stuff enough ballots that it takes a massive turn out of Republican voters to over ride their theft. Any other influence like people voting for Perot will of course cause the Republican to lose part of the massive number of votes he must receive to over ride the vote fraud factor.

89 posted on 08/12/2002 6:30:51 AM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson