What your post does consist of, however, are your standard arguments from incredulity, arguments from ignorance, errors in math, errors in genetics, misunderstandings of evolutionary theory (in some cases willful misunderstandings), and repostings of stuff that others have answered time and time again. You also seem to have me confused with someone else. You've attributed statements to me that I've never made. Not that I find that surprising.
One last observation, this time regarding knowledge. You posted, "It is not lack of knowledge that disproves evolution, it is knowledge that disproves evolution." Interesting claim about knowledge ... but I've heard interesting claims about knowledge before. I have an interview with Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, who was a physician as well as being the creator of Sherlock Holmes. In the interview he states, regarding the existence of fairies in a garden in Cottingley, "I don't believe they exist, I know they exist." Here's one of the photos that gave him his "knowledge."
