Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cheney Stays in the Picture (Dowd alert)
The New York Times ^ | 08/11/2002 | Maureen Dowd

Posted on 08/10/2002 5:50:04 PM PDT by Pokey78

WASHINGTON — One could hear the exhale of relief from the conservative multitudes — and the "Ruffles and Flourishes" playing in the gladdened hearts of Republican graybeards.

For Cheney, Mighty Cheney was advancing to the bat.

A question mark had been quivering over the White House. There had been a frenzy of speculation and an outpouring of analysis among the capital cognoscenti.

Thomas Mann of the Brookings Institution was teetering on the brink of observing that the Bush presidency was "teetering on the brink." Ibid., Norman Ornstein.

So Republicans were thrilled to hear the vice president tell a worshipful crowd of white, wealthy people at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco last week that he would be willing to run with the president in 2004.

He called his White House tenure — incognito, undisclosed, classified and unavailable — "the high point of my professional life." The humility in his tone was unmistakable.

Republicans had been worrying about the health factor — not that Mr. Cheney's was getting worse but that Mr. Bush's was getting better.

The more buff the president grew, the more party solons fretted that he was frittering away time in the gym that could be better used formulating clear policies in a roiling time.

Last week, the president had his best checkup ever, with doctors swooning over his lissome lipoprotein, taut triglycerides, sleek homocysteine, A-plus C-reactive protein levels and thin body fat.

In a city where being a grind is better than being a glamourpuss, suspicion falls on those who are too modish or too toned. Are they spending more hours cross-training than studying the Law of the Sea Treaty?

So it is with the president. He looks too good.

Even Republicans have begun privately admitting what Democrats have been whispering: Mr. Cheney is running the country. He can't get off the ticket because Mr. Bush won't get off the treadmill.

While hobnobbing near Nob Hill, Mr. Cheney waved off inquiries about accounting irregularities at Halliburton during the time he was paid over $45 million as chief executive.

He referred the curious to the Halliburton Web site, where nearly all traces of his existence at the company have been inexplicably scrubbed. In a master stroke that easily threw the press off the scent, Mr. Cheney said that a transcript available at www.halliburton.com would satisfy all remaining questions.

But there is no transcript on the Web site, only a link to a conference-call recording that lets those with audio software listen to barely audible, tinny voices proclaiming that Dick Cheney did nothing wrong.

Republicans are most grateful to Mr. Cheney. With the time he saved by not explaining administration policy to the president and the country, and the time he saved refusing to answer reporters' nitpicking questions about his past business schemes, he has been able to fly around raising more than $12 million for Republican candidates.

On Tuesday, he'll interrupt his monthlong break in Wyoming to preside over the president's Waco economic forum, which is designed to present Mr. Bush as a leader who is engaged with the country's economic fears, rather than one who is on a monthlong vacation from them.

Like a buoyant Dr. Evil holding a napping Bush Mini-Me in a Snugli, Mr. Cheney seems to relish running the world alone. Consider how primary the secondary man is.

Without Mr. Cheney, America would not be planning to invade Iraq. Who else understands why the U.S. is starting a war without provocation for the first time in its history?

Without Mr. Cheney, and his reverence for oil and the House of Saud, wouldn't Foggy Bottom demand that the Saudis, like other allies, nurture democracy and women's rights and stop coddling terrorists?

Without Mr. Cheney, might there be a real economic policy, not just all-tax-cuts-all-the-time?

Without Mr. Cheney, who in the West Wing would have resisted tougher corporate responsibility laws?

Without Mr. Cheney, who would have had the secret contacts in the energy industry to help formulate federal energy policies?

Only one question remains: Will the vice keep the president?


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dowd; michaeldouglas; zetajones
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Pokey78
Margaret Carlson down, at least one more to go.
21 posted on 08/10/2002 8:14:09 PM PDT by UB355
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UB355
When Monica was giving Clinton hummers, Maureen defended it as necessary to help the Sinkmeister "relax." When Bush engages in a healthful, moral, decent form of relaxation, Maureen denounces it as shiriking his duties.

Gee, could it be that one Prez is a Democrat and the other a Republican? Could it be that one Prez is pro-abortion and the other is pro--life?

22 posted on 08/10/2002 8:27:01 PM PDT by FirstFlaBn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Hey Dowd...I thought I told you to:

SHUT YOUR PIE HOLE!!!!!

23 posted on 08/10/2002 8:29:34 PM PDT by VRW Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter
Oh! FORGIVE ME! hehe

From Oxblog:

IMMUTABLE LAWS OF DOWD

1. Ashcroft never deserves credit.

2. Offering constructive solutions to problems, instead of whining endlessly about them, is a sign of weakness.

3. The People Magazine principle: all political phenomena can be explained with reference solely to caricatures of the personalities involved ("Dubya" is stupid; "Poppy" is an aristocrat; Cheney is macho-man; etc.). Any reference to the common good or even to old-fashioned politicking is, like, so passe.

4. It is much better to be cute than coherent.

5. Maureen knows best. Her long years as a columnist (doing basically what your great-aunt Tillie does in the nursing home bull sessions, but getting paid for it) have given her deep insight into foreign relations, politics, welfare, the Constitution, and all other topics. To disagree with Maureen in any way is not only a sign of being wrong, it's a hallmark of pure evil...or at least membership in the NRA, which is pretty much the same thing.

6. It is usually possible and always desirable to name-drop and name-call in the same sentence.

7. The particulars of my consumer-driven, shamefully self-involved life reveal universal truths.


24 posted on 08/10/2002 8:57:37 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"..holding a napping Bush Mini-Me in a Snugli,.."

More baby references-seems like every column has gibberish and baby talk,( which of course is supposedly emanating from GW) or baby metaphors. Psych 101-someone better watch this woman if they see her lurking near a neonate ward.
25 posted on 08/10/2002 9:13:36 PM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: section9
Let me be the first to say it: "Maureen, you ignorant slut!"

You've nailed it. Everything Dowd thinks she knows about "W", she learned from Will Ferrell and SNL.

26 posted on 08/11/2002 7:22:19 AM PDT by TC Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider
Apparently Ms. Dowd has decided that the "Bush is dumb" line isn't working so she is switching (momentarily at least) to the "Bush isn't really running the country".

The Dems and their mouthpieces in the media seem to have only two running lines to work with. Give Ms. Dowd a break, she's doing the best she can with the material she's been given to regurgitate.

Her perenial bitchiness is getting a bit wearing though. But you know libs..they have no sense of nuance, especially not the ever cranky Ms. Dowd.

27 posted on 08/11/2002 8:37:42 AM PDT by AquariusStar22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: AquariusStar22
Her perenial bitchiness is getting a bit wearing though. But you know libs..they have no sense of nuance, especially not the ever cranky Ms. Dowd.

Could it be? Is it possible? Could Dowdy be the Molly Ivins for the new millenium?

28 posted on 08/11/2002 8:51:41 AM PDT by TC Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider
Now there's an interesting theory.

Hmmmm..both rabid reflectively anti-Bush. Same snide remarks posing as clever asides. Repeating themselves over and over again.

I think Ms. Dowd had better take a second look at Good Golly Mz. Molly...that's where she'll be in 10 years.

Now if that doesn't scare her I don't know what will.

29 posted on 08/11/2002 9:08:14 AM PDT by AquariusStar22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
It is good to know the Lebanese-Arab-American view through Ms. Dowd.

is this her ethnic background?

30 posted on 08/11/2002 9:22:01 AM PDT by 1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 1234
AFAIK, Dowdy is as Irish as they come.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

31 posted on 08/11/2002 9:27:16 AM PDT by section9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Maureen Dowd...proof that the New York Times is an equal-opportunity employer. They gave her an op-ed column even though she writes like a college newspaper columnist. Strike that...there are probably a good number of college newspaper columnists who write more intelligently than she does. I apologize for insulting them by comparing them to her.
32 posted on 08/11/2002 11:43:01 AM PDT by RichInOC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
It's so easy to see that Maureen thinks her little comments are so cute. She has no clue that they simply come off as common jealous female prattle. I've often wondered who belts down more drinks as she's writing her column....Maureen or Helen Thomas?
33 posted on 08/11/2002 11:52:43 AM PDT by Allegra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider
Not nearly fat enough...yet.
34 posted on 08/11/2002 12:33:10 PM PDT by RichInOC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dighton
Catherine Zeta-Jones makes my T-Mobile.
35 posted on 08/11/2002 12:34:26 PM PDT by RichInOC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Ms Dowd makes stupid and stupider look damn smart.

Ms. Dowdy gives new meaning to the term "Media Whore".

36 posted on 08/11/2002 2:38:31 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
But there is no transcript on the Web site, only a link to a conference-call recording that lets those with audio software listen to barely audible, tinny voices proclaiming that Dick Cheney did nothing wrong.

Is Ms. Dowdy admitting that:

1. She doesn't have "audio software"?

2. She can't be bothered spending a few minutes to learn the truth?

3. She "Can't Stand the Truth"?

37 posted on 08/11/2002 2:59:41 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: section9
Interestingly enough, this very article is published on Judicial Watch.
38 posted on 08/12/2002 8:48:14 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson