Posted on 08/10/2002 10:30:07 AM PDT by HAL9000
Your explanation has merit, but only reinforces my point. Linux, due to being easier to install on a server, should have lower costs than an identical server running Windows.
But your explanation has less merit when you realize that you only have to go through the configuration ordeal once. Then you use an image server and the install is automated.
Again, Linux should be cheaper, but it isn't.
There are countless examples of technological products that become cheaper as sales increase.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.