Yes, and I daresay Clinton read some books that explain the concepts of honesty, courage, etc. Whether one understands what one has read is a separate question.
From your repeated assertions that libertarianism lacks fixed ethical principles, it is plain that your reading comprehension in this case leaves something to be desired.
Steve, this is the last time I'm going to ask this of you, and then I'm going to ignore you. You consistently refuse to advance your "principles". You attempted once, and from that result I can understand your reticence. Here's the deal. Unless you start laying out your moral system--i.e. your atheistic-libertarian bases for moral behavior--I have nothing to say to you.
Apparently you think I'm on this thread so you can throw spitballs at whatever I post. Uh uh. If you want your ideas to prevail you must state them. That goes for everyone who wants to engage in debate with me. I have no problem posting and defending what I believe, yet over and over again when I ask secularists and libertarians to establish and defend a moral system they either disappear or throw some half-baked Randian blurb at me and skedaddle. If you want to argue, then, as Rand says, let me:
"check your premises" for you.
You got one more chance Steve, then you go on ignore. I don't have time for "neener, neener, neener" anymore.